home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:16777 sci.physics:20991 sci.bio:4538 sci.chem:5360 misc.education:5176
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.physics,sci.bio,sci.chem,misc.education
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7q
- From: crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass)
- Subject: Re: TIME HAS INERTIA - NewScientist Article
- Message-ID: <1992Dec12.195654.7419@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia
- References: <abian.723244875@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu> <klclauss.4.723351158@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1992Dec11.024139.12143@dmp.csiro.au>
- Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 19:56:54 GMT
- Lines: 70
-
- In article <1992Dec11.024139.12143@dmp.csiro.au> lachlan@dmp.csiro.au (Lachlan Cranswick) writes:
- >
- >I just read got this weeks New Scientist. In the Feedback
- >section on the second last page they mention this TIME
- >HAS INERTIA thing on the Internet but also mention
- >there is now a scale called the CRACKPOT INDEX.
-
- Just what we need, validation for Abian. Why couldn't
- the mention have appeared in the American Journal of
- Psychiatry?
-
- Of course, that would probably have been validation too.
-
- >Which groups are these appearing in and are they being saved
- >for posterity? I would appreciate anyone who could email
- >me the spoof posts or tell me of an ftp site where
- >they are stored.
-
- God forbid. 'Posterity' would think us quite batty.s
-
- >Back to this INERTIA thing, I forgot most of my physics
- >after my last 1st year Physics exam so I cannot add anything
- >technical to the dabate. But I do have a few questions:-
- >
- >But is it coincidence or fate
- >that this theory has come soon after the decision by the Vatican
- >to admit that Galelao? (I forgot most of my spelling after my last
- >high school English exam) was right that the EARTH revolves
- >around the SUN. It only took them 500 or so years to realize
- >their mistake.
-
- Let's get one thing straight; Abian is spouting vacuous
- irrelevancies. It has nothing to do with 1) nature 2) fate
- 3) coincidence 4) galileo. His repeated statements, when
- they even make sense, boil down to 'THINGS CHANGE UNLESS
- THEY DON'T' (using his idiom). I think you can see
- that this is not exactly stunning news. Crackpots are also
- not new, but usually they at least have charm enough to
- provide physical predictions.
-
- Also, he continually misuses the term 'inertia'.
-
- >Also what was the name of that "CRACKPOT" who suggested in the
- >1950's that the continents are moving, partly based on how you
- >could fit part of Africa onto South America? like a jigsaw
- >puzzle? It is a pity the internet did not exist then
- >because it could have been a pretty good flame-war.
-
- There is a difference, Wegener at least had
- a physical theory that made predictions. Abian has
- a bunch of words that have no scientific meaning.
- (By the way, Wegener died in 1930).
- >
- >I'm sorry if this has come up before but I lost news for 55
- >hours because of a dodgy computer on the other end of the wire.
- >
- >"Stay Cool, Whats going to happen in 55 hours?" I was asked.
- >
- >Nothing, EXCEPT THE LAWS OF PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY ARE BEING
- >REWRITTEN AND I AM THE LAST TO FIND OUT ABOUT IT!!!!
-
- This has been going on for probably 55 days. I don't
- see any end to it.
-
- dale bass
- --
- C. R. Bass crb7q@virginia.edu
- Department of Mechanical,
- Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering
- University of Virginia (804) 924-7926
-