home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!castle.ed.ac.uk!jlothian
- From: jlothian@castle.ed.ac.uk (J Lothian)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
- Subject: Re: Mach vs. NT?
- Message-ID: <29475@castle.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 12 Dec 92 17:16:51 GMT
- References: <92344.175322ASODL@ASUACAD.BITNET>
- Sender: nntpusr@castle.ed.ac.uk
- Organization: Edinburgh University Computing Service
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <92344.175322ASODL@ASUACAD.BITNET>, ASODL@ASUACAD.BITNET writes:
- |> I am looking to obtain a little feedback on a few impressions that I have about
- |> this "new" kid on the block called Windows NT. First, can someone tell me what
- |> the "NT" stands for?
-
- 'New Technology', as far as I know.
-
- James
-
- --
-
- -------------------------------------------------------
- James Lothian | "It's life, Jim,
- james@uk.ac.ed.caad | but not as we know it"
-