home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.irc
- Path: sparky!uunet!ornl!sunova!linac!uwm.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU!gl8f
- From: gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl)
- Subject: Re: yes or no? (bot deopping)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec13.192502.3175@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia
- References: <1g5lmrINNh0k@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <85220@ut-emx.uucp> <Bz7Lw3.IEq@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 19:25:02 GMT
- Lines: 8
-
- In article <Bz7Lw3.IEq@news.cso.uiuc.edu> StarOwl@uiuc.edu writes:
-
- >The /kick idea is interesting, but I'm not completely fond of it. An
- >alternative (in the one chan-op scheme especially) would be to give /kick
- >a few more teeth -- add an automatic ban as an after-effect of a kick.
-
- This would be a great (and easy) feature to implement in a client.
- Don't clutter the server.
-