home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.philosophy.misc:2556 sci.philosophy.tech:4210
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!psgrain!ee.und.ac.za!shrike.und.ac.za!pc11.superbowl.und.ac.za!spurrett
- From: spurrett@superbowl.und.ac.za (David Spurrett)
- Newsgroups: talk.philosophy.misc,sci.philosophy.tech
- Subject: Re: FREE WILL 2: Neither a Determinist nor an Indeterminist be.
- Message-ID: <spurrett.56.722363066@superbowl.und.ac.za>
- Date: 21 Nov 92 16:24:26 GMT
- Article-I.D.: superbow.spurrett.56.722363066
- References: <spurrett.37.721583229@superbowl.und.ac.za> <spurrett.50.722073674@superbowl.und.ac.za> <1992Nov18.175136.9373@guinness.idbsu.edu>
- Organization: University Of Natal (Durban)
- Lines: 25
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pc11.superbowl.und.ac.za
-
- In article <1992Nov18.175136.9373@guinness.idbsu.edu> holmes@garnet.idbsu.edu (Randall Holmes) writes:
-
- (1)
- >Physical objects are (complexes of) events and have causes.
- --------------->
- What do events happen to unless there are some `things' in the world?
- What do they happen with for that matter? Are you saying that there
- are no `things' at all? (Independent of their reduction to the flow
- of events, that is.)
-
- (2)
- >This is re Spurrett's attempt to use causation by things to avoid
- >determinism.
- --------------->
- I think that this description is slightly misleading. I find that
- determinism is unequal to the task of describing/explaining certain
- feautres of the world, and look for an ontology which does. I am not
- attempting to `avoid' anything, but rejecting a defined thesis with
- clear reasons.
-
- o------------------------------------------o------------------------------o
- | David Spurrett, Department of Philosophy | `I have seen the truth, and |
- | University of Natal, Durban | it makes no sense.' |
- | email: spurrett@superbowl.und.ac.za | - OFFICIAL! |
- o------------------------------------------o------------------------------o
-