home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!olivea!charnel!rat!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!rochester!rocksanne!news
- From: chris@eso.mc.xerox.com (Chris Heiny 73186 - SETA)
- Newsgroups: sci.geo.geology
- Subject: Re: life, Moon and geology
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.130829.19356@spectrum.xerox.com>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 13:08:29 GMT
- References: <1992Nov11.175421.19955@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>
- Sender: news@spectrum.xerox.com
- Reply-To: chris@eso.mc.xerox.com
- Organization: Xerox Corporation, Webster NY
- Lines: 20
-
-
- First, panspermia and creationism aside, there are valid propositions
- for the start of life in places other than tidal pools. The one I recall
- best right now is midocean thermal vents: they've got plenty of heat, a
- nice supply of dissolved chemicals, and in general the area is a good
- place for interesting reactions to happen.
-
- It is doubtful that the CO2 would have preciptated as carbonate. Even
- today large amounts of calcium carbonate shell/skeletal matter never
- makes it to the bottom, dissolving on the way down. The level below
- which the carbonates dissolve is known by a number of names, such as
- carbonate compensation depth.
-
- It wasn't so much the CO2 removal as the addition of oxygen that seriously
- reduced the iron concentrations in the oceans. Potentially even more
- important than the reduction of UV radiation from ozone formation was
- the adaptation of life to a high oxygen environment. Oxygen is highly
- poisonous to many (if not all) anaerobic bacteria.
-
- Chris
-