home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!seagoon.newcastle.edu.au!wombat.newcastle.edu.au!eepjm
- From: eepjm@wombat.newcastle.edu.au (Peter Moylan)
- Subject: Re: How's it hanging? (was Re: What's cooking?)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.103445.1@wombat.newcastle.edu.au>
- Lines: 26
- Sender: news@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au
- Organization: University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA
- References: <BxvMIH.JvE@cs.psu.edu> <1ec3g6INNrep@agate.berkeley.edu> <BxxAC1.Ms4@cck.coventry.ac.uk> <1992Nov19.170942.15605@oracorp.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 23:34:45 GMT
-
- In article <1992Nov19.170942.15605@oracorp.com>, harper@oracorp.com (Douglas Harper) writes:
- >
- > Seriously though, back to the past participle. The rule is a little
- > more complicated, the way I understand it. An animate being was hanged
- > if its death came by hanging. An inanimate object was hung when it was
- > dangled somewhere. So it's proper to say (apologies to Mel Brooks):
- >
- > The cowboy and his horse were hanged at dawn. Their corpses
- > were hung in the public square afterwards.
- >
- > -- Doug (never hanged like a horsethief) Harper
- >
- > P.S. It may even be more complicated. The corpse of Cromwell was
- > disinterred and then (hanged/hung) for a traitor and regicide. Which
- > is it? I'd say "hanged" there because the intent was to treat the
- > corpse as though it were animate and could suffer punishment. The same
- > way, you might say that an effigy of <choose a politician or sports
- > official> was hanged.
-
- I prefer a simpler rule. Forget about the animate/inanimate distinction.
- "Hung" refers to all forms of dangling, but "hanged" refers to a
- very specific procedure which involves putting a rope around the neck
- and then letting the victim drop. From this point of view, there's
- no doubt that the corpse of Cromwell was hanged.
- --
- Peter Moylan eepjm@wombat.newcastle.edu.au
-