home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!udel!princeton!crux!roger
- From: roger@crux.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig)
- Subject: Re: Derivation of "wonk"
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.161455.20094@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux.princeton.edu
- Reply-To: roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig)
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <1992Nov19.231101.29504@Cadence.COM>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 16:14:55 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1992Nov19.231101.29504@Cadence.COM> vince@cadence.com (Vince Gibboni) writes:
- >> (Ted B Samsel) writes:
- >> I like this word WONK. As in policy WONK. Any ideas on the
- >> derivations thereof?
-
- > Sounds suspiciously similar to wonky...
-
- Well, when I was in college, about 17 years ago, I was told that
- a) the expression came from MIT, and
- b) that a WONK is someone who KNOWs everything backwards.
-
- I think I saw the same explanation in a Safire column some time
- later, though that's not necessarily worth much.
-
- Roger
-