home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.usage.english:8619 alt.sex:36604
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english,alt.sex
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!nic.umass.edu!news.amherst.edu!twpierce
- From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
- Subject: Re: A gender neutral pronoun
- Message-ID: <Bxx8MK.Mn4@unix.amherst.edu>
- Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Stuff & Nonsense Division
- References: <BxL0I3.1z4@unix.amherst.edu> <1992Nov18.100410.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au> <722057498@ptero.cs.duke.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:01:31 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <722057498@ptero.cs.duke.edu> dsb@duke.cs.duke.edu (D. Scott Bigham) writes:
-
- >From the Holy Book of <1992Nov18.100410.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au>
- > as spake by ccjal@cc.newcastle.edu.au (John A Lambert) :
- >
- >>Even `grammarians' gave up long ago worrying about `you' being used for both
- >>singular and plural.
- >
- >Wait, 'you' _is_ both a second-person singular pronoun and a
- >second-person plural pronoun.
-
- Only because that usage became so common. If it were not in common
- usage, you would be arguing the opposite.
-
- >"Oh, someone will be coming by with the Harrison transcripts. Send them
- > to Joe in room 405."
- >
- >Now, does the 'them' in that sentence refer to the transcripts or to the
- >person bringing them?
- >
- >See the problem?
-
- Yes. It's called "ambiguity," and it comes with the territory. I
- could cite you a dozen other perfectly grammatical, ambiguous
- sentences -- most notably involving the word "you," which you have
- already declared to be both singular and plural.
-
- --
- ____ Tim Pierce /
- \ / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu / Rocks say goodbye.
- \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
-