home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!princeton!crux!roger
- From: roger@crux.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig)
- Subject: Re: quite unique
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.205013.9897@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux.princeton.edu
- Reply-To: roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig)
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <1992Nov16.044517.15622@bcrka451.bnr.ca> <1992Nov16.052332.20190@Princeton.EDU> <1992Nov16.143247.22895@bcrka451.bnr.ca>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 20:50:13 GMT
- Lines: 36
-
- In article <1992Nov16.143247.22895@bcrka451.bnr.ca> nadeau@bcarh1ab.bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov16.052332.20190@Princeton.EDU> roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig) writes:
- >>In article <1992Nov16.044517.15622@bcrka451.bnr.ca> nadeau@bcarh1ab.bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau) writes:
- >>>If you use "unique" to mean "rare" or "unusual" or "a nice knockdown
- >>>argument", then what word will you use when you really mean "unique"?
-
- >>Why, "unique" of course. (Note that "unique" *really* means "singular,"
- >>"rare," etc. as well as "one-of-a-kind.") I use "unique" to mean
- >>"one-of-a-kind" when the context makes that meaning clear. I'm also
- >>pretty good at fashioning appropriate contexts, they tell me.
-
- >So you're relying on the intelligence of your reader to guess what you
- >mean when you say "unique" - this from the man who has peppered his
- >posts with "Can't you read?" complaints.
-
- Well, yes, I am. And so are all the other millions who use the word in
- any or all of its four or five accepted meanings.
-
- As for my "can't you read" complaints, they usually have to do with
- a "not" that someone's overlooked. You can use any standard meaning
- of "not" that you like, but *do* take it into account.
-
- >Of course, of course, your readers will always know exactly what you
- >mean, even if you don't bother using the best word for the job. And if
-
- I'd love to know how to determine the "best" word for a job when there
- are several suitable ones. Can you tell me?
-
- >they don't, it must be because they can't read - it couldn't possibly be
- >that you were less than 100% clear.
-
- Please show me an example of this. I can't really respond to hypotheticals
- like that.
-
- Roger
-
-