home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!ruhets.rutgers.edu!farris
- From: farris@ruhets.rutgers.edu (Lorenzo Farris)
- Newsgroups: alt.consciousness
- Subject: I like Zen (was Re: I like consciousness)
- Message-ID: <Nov.23.11.58.02.1992.22974@ruhets.rutgers.edu>
- Date: 23 Nov 92 16:58:02 GMT
- References: <1992Nov20.175526.1@hamp.hampshire.edu:<1992Nov22.180053.3672@cgrg.ohio-state.edu> <kf45PTu00WB80IYGcD@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
- Lines: 135
-
- In article <kf45PTu00WB80IYGcD@andrew.cmu.edu>, lord+@andrew.cmu.edu (Tom Lord) writes:
-
- I don't mean that we
- :would be wide-eyed and full of wonder, but that we would be helpless,
- :entirely dependant organisms lost in an overwhelming sea of sensation.
- :This might be fun for a few hours, but it isn't a healthy way to live :-)
- :
-
- I disagree with this. Ever try it? I would guess not, because this
- description is not even close. I know it is kind of futile to put
- the experience into words, I just try to give a flavor of it. If
- anything, I would contend it is the healthiest way to live. You think
- when it is appropriate to think, act when it is appropriate to act.
-
- I am my most effective when I am not thinking.
-
- :Personally, i've taken the message of zen to be this: all of our
- :scripts, models, and stock behaviors are there in our brains. They
- :are not the product of will that brings them to bear -- they are
- :well-worn paths through the statespace of brainstates -- they are
- :potential wells. The nice thing about these paths, and our brains in
- :general, is that they are self-optimizing.
-
- I disagree with this statement. Based on my observations of my self
- and many other people, they are pretty random in whether they improve
- or not.
-
- Furthermore, this may be what you have extracted from zen, but that is
- one tiny part of zen.
-
- Given lots of past
- :experience and data about the present, our brains will tend to fall
- :into helpful states.
-
- Sounds like you've been very fortunate in life. I observe most people
- fall into the equivalent of hypnosis and stay there most of their
- lives.
-
- Our brains can only fall into helpful states if you can let the data
- in. If you're too busy telling yourself things should be this way or
- things should be that way then you never have a chance to collect any
- real data.
-
- The zen stories often strike me as reminders
- :that it is almost never worthwhile to anticipate or second-guess or
- :direct what one's self will do.
-
- Better yet, they are reminders to JUST do.
-
- The process is automatic and,
- :generally speaking, better served by a `will' that wants to observe
- :than one that wants to control. Zen, i think, is about the boundries
- :of the self and about tactics for harmonizing with the other.
- :
-
- Huh?
-
- :I think that nowadays we might consider talking about zen, not only in
- :phenomenological terms, but also in physiological terms. I'm not sure
- :it would work out -- but i think that instead of talking about the
- :state of no-mind we could try to talk about ideals for how our
- :attention should be directed. Not that we could just place our
- :attention arbitrarily, but having an ideal gives us something to
- :notice about ourselves. Its a source of, hopefully useful, feedback.
- :Consider a person working some well-developed manual skill: no motion
- :is wasted, the person is relaxed and alert, and the work is subtle,
- :useful, and beautiful. These things come about not because the person
- :has no-mind, but because their attention, the work, and their library
- :of skills are all feeding back on each other -- and the person is not
- :trying for any more or less than is happening.
-
- You have misunderstood what is meant by no-mind. As it is doomed to be
- misunderstood when one conceptualizes it. When a person is a master
- in a physical skill, there is no thought at all in the action. There
- is just a doing, and that's it. There is no trying in no-mind. "No
- try. Do, not do. No Try"-Yoda
-
- :
- :I think we might also talk about zen politics. After all, given the
- :description above, its hard to see any action that wouldn't conform to
- :the zen ideal...
-
- Any action, performed in the right state of mind.
-
- because after all, the control we are advised to give
- :up is really an illusion, and no matter what else is going on, our
- :brains are still just following their own rules. Political thought
- :resolves the paradox, i think. When we are focused on control, it is
- :not that our attention is operating outside of zen principals -- but
- :it is the case that our attention is focused on conformance to social
- :constructions. When our attention is turned inward in such a way as
- :to interfere with our own organisms there is still a zen craftsperson
- :at work -- but that craftsperson is a social construct, a
- :transpersonal phenomenon, and not necessarily one whose projects
- :include the nurturing of human lives.
-
- Could you please rephrase that. I don't understand this paragraph.
-
- :
- :I won't try to draw it out in this post, but i also think of zen
- :teachings as similar to classical greek attitudes about moderation;
- :also as similar to musical instruction that focuses on listening and
- :reacting rather than on drill and control.
- :
- :
- : The 'goal' of Zen is intuitive understanding of existence. This is
- : beyond any conceptualization.
- :
- :An intuitive understanding of where one is at is different from a
- :conceptualization. For one thing, a conceptualization can be
- :communicated while an intuition can not (without first being reduced
- :to a conceptualization). But i think there is hope that we can come
- :to a conceptual (and ultimately technical) understanding of the
- :processes that make up intution.
- :
-
- My original post was in response to someone's description of
- meditation, and I tried to respond by giving a brief explanation of
- what my form of meditation is like. If you find my explanations vague,
- that cannot be helped, because it is purely experiential. It is not an
- experience that can possibly be captured by words. Therefor, I can
- only recommend the prerequisites for achieving such an experience.
-
- If you would like to go off on a discussion of Buddhist psychology and
- politics, that is all well and good. If you want to talk meditation,
- talk meditation. But before you talk meditation, find a teacher and DO
- meditation. Before you talk zen, spend some time DOING zen.
-
- yours in contentiousness,
- Lorenzo
- --
- "Once upon a time men were possessed ******************************
- by devils. Now they are not less * Lorenzo Farris *
- obsessed by ideas" -CG Jung * farris@ruhets.rutgers.edu *
- ******************************
-