home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!nigel.msen.com!fmsrl7!lynx!nmsu.edu!opus!ted
- From: ted@nmsu.edu (Ted Dunning)
- Subject: Re: Pressure to get it right
- In-Reply-To: Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 17 Jul 1992 04:13:16 GMT
- Message-ID: <TED.92Jul25001257@pylos.nmsu.edu>
- Sender: usenet@nmsu.edu
- Reply-To: ted@nmsu.edu
- Organization: Computing Research Lab
- References: <920716225805_72240.1256_EHL48-2@CompuServe.COM>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 07:12:57 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
-
- In article <920716225805_72240.1256_EHL48-2@CompuServe.COM> Jed
- Rothwell <72240.1256@compuserve.com> writes:
-
- Pretend that someone has handed you a multimeter and a thermometer
- and said, "measure the amps, volts, and temperature of that cell.
- Be sure you get the temperature right to within one degree C. If
- you get it wrong, our government will loose $100 million, and you
- will spend the rest of your life working at MacDonalds."
-
- Would you do the work carefully? Would you repeat the measurement
- over again, to be sure you got it right? Of course you would!
-
-
- actually the human answer is not to make sure they get it right, but
- rather to recruit enough others so that the blame for getting it wrong
- will be spread around enough. this results in a massive decrease in
- the collective intelligence applied to the problem and often results
- in stupid decisions.
-
-
- with regard to miti being terribly careful people, take the 5th
- generation project as the canonical counter-example. there were lots
- of claims made by people regarded as trustworthy by miti, and now
- a few years and yen later, the program is essentially a bust. none of
- the real goals of the project were met.
-
-
-