home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!gumby!yale!yale.edu!jvnc.net!rutgers!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu!ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu!v5875bza
- From: v5875bza@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Michael M Gorman Jr)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: A question from an ignorant philosopher.
- Message-ID: <Bs5LC1.7HE@acsu.buffalo.edu>
- Date: 29 Jul 92 14:55:00 GMT
- Sender: nntp@acsu.buffalo.edu
- Organization: University at Buffalo
- Lines: 33
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu
-
- Dear mathematicians,
-
- I'm a philosophy student doing research on something called
- "ontological priority". First I'm trying to get clear on what
- "priority" means, and it has to do with order. My wife pointed out
- to me that order is something that mathematicians have defined
- rigorously, so I consulted some math dictionaries. Unfortunately,
- I found two different definitions.
-
- Two of the dictionaries defined order in a way that is modeled
- on the inequality relation. A set S is partially ordered if there
- is a relation R for that set such that (if aRb, then not-bRa and a is
- not b), and (if aRb and bRc, then aRc). In other words, if there
- is a relation that is non-symmetrical and transitive. A totally ordered
- set is one that for which it is also true that for any two members a,b
- of S, either aRb or bRa or a=b.
- One of the dictionaries modeled it on the "less than or equal to"
- relation. A set S is partially ordered if there is a relation R
- such that (aRa), (if aRb and bRa, then a=b), and (if aRb and bRc,
- then aRc). In other words, reflexive, antisymmetric, transitive.
- Total ordering is defined by adding the same extra restriction as above.
-
- Partly I'm curious as to how it came to be that these two things
- go by the same name, but mostly what I need to know is which one is
- standard usage.
-
- Any help you can give me would be greatly appreciated!
-
- Thanks!
-
- Michael M. Gorman
- Department of Philosophy
- State Univ. of NY at Buffalo
-