home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca!mroussel
- From: mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Marc Roussel)
- Subject: Re: library cutbacks
- Message-ID: <1992Jul28.184718.24280@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
- Organization: Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto
- References: <Jul.14.03.38.05.1992.27933@remus.rutgers.edu> <1992Jul17.212740.16594@ariel.ec.usf.edu> <92210.010238U53644@uicvm.uic.edu>
- Distribution: sci
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 18:47:18 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <92210.010238U53644@uicvm.uic.edu> <U53644@uicvm.uic.edu> writes:
- > What's wrong with desktop publishing ? [...]
- >this purpose), and some commonly marketed software. One loses a little
- >elegance [...]
- >but if the other option is to have too few journals, it
- >would seem to be an acceptable loss.
-
- I would argue that there are already too many journals out there.
- "Publish or perish", as we currently know it, results in volume but not
- usually in quality. The budget crunch which our university libraries
- are facing is a good thing as it should result in some of the (intellectually)
- poorer journals ceasing publication and in the better journals becoming even
- more selective.
-
- Marc R. Roussel
- mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca
-