home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!cam-cl!cam-cl!cet1
- From: cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: random triangles
- Keywords: asymptotics, acute triangles
- Message-ID: <1992Jul28.141020.23558@cl.cam.ac.uk>
- Date: 28 Jul 92 14:10:20 GMT
- References: <BrvLF2.7q@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <1992Jul28.131046.6090@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>
- Sender: news@cl.cam.ac.uk (The news facility)
- Reply-To: cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson)
- Organization: U of Cambridge Computer Lab, UK
- Lines: 34
-
- In article <1992Jul28.131046.6090@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>,
- wft@math.canterbury.ac.nz (Bill Taylor) writes:
- |> > What is the probability that a random triangle is acute
- |>
- |> I think this problem might have appeared here before. It is more elegant to
- |> formalize the concept of a random triangle in R^2 , as that formed by three
- |> lines whose angles are independemtly chosen from uniform[0,2pi].
- |>
- |> [proof that the answer is 1/4 in this case omitted]
-
- More elegant, or just easier to solve?
-
- In his original posting, jmborwei@orion.waterloo.edu (Jonathan Borwein)
- wrote
- > More precisely, if random lattice triples are picked in [0,n],[0,n],
- > what is the behaviour of the number of triples corresponding to acute
- > triangles as n->oo?
-
- More generally, what is the probability that the triangle formed by
- 3 points selected randomly and independantly from a convex region K
- of R^2 is acute? JB's formulation is the case when K is a square.
- Numerical simulation suggests that the probability is 0.274... if
- K is a square, 0.280... if K is a circle.
-
- I suspect that the required reference is [1], but as I haven't looked
- it up yet, I could be quite wrong.
-
- [1] M.G.Kendall, "Exact distributions for the shape of random triangles
- in convex sets", Advances in Applied Probability 17 (1985) 308-329.
-
- Chris Thompson
- Cambridge University Computing Service
- JANET: cet1@uk.ac.cam.phx
- Internet: cet1@phx.cam.ac.uk
-