home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / sci / edu / 908 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-07-28  |  1.1 KB  |  26 lines
  1. Newsgroups: sci.edu
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!sifon!news
  3. From: 13r43@math.ucrf.edu
  4. Subject: Re: worst labs and science activities
  5. Message-ID: <1992Jul29.035510.25603@sifon.cc.mcgill.ca>
  6. Sender: news@sifon.cc.mcgill.ca
  7. Nntp-Posting-Host: mafalda.math.mcgill.ca
  8. Organization: McGill University
  9. References: <1992Jul28.205555.12168@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
  10. Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 03:55:10 GMT
  11. Lines: 13
  12.  
  13. In article <1992Jul28.205555.12168@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>  
  14. ebrownst@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Erica M Brownstein) writes:
  15. > We are putting together a workshop for educators that will help them to
  16. > distinguish "good" science labs/activities from "bad' science  
  17. labs/activities.
  18. > In order to do this, we are collecting "bad" science labs and activities that
  19. > are available to educators.
  20. > 
  21. > If you have a science activity or lab that you would like to nominate for the
  22. > ten worst science activities, please send your suggestion to us!! 
  23. Got to be the SSC. Of course, your school district will need $8.25 billion if  
  24. they want to try that experiment !
  25.  
  26.