home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!mips!rtech!angular!jas
- From: jas@angular.uucp (Jim Shankland)
- Subject: Modems, compression, and SLIP or PPP (was Re: Using Telebit PEP with SLIP)
- Message-ID: <1992Jul22.171145.25307@angular.uucp>
- Sender: jas%angular.uucp@ingres.com
- Reply-To: jas%angular.UUCP@ingres.com (Jim Shankland)
- Organization: Angular Systems
- References: <cluther.711678266@morticia> <3619@randvax.rand.org> <BOB.92Jul21000352@volitans.MorningStar.Com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 17:11:45 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <BOB.92Jul21000352@volitans.MorningStar.Com> bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) writes:
- [Lots of interesting stuff, the upshot of which is:]
-
- >Right. Use TurboPEP in links like Pakistan to Ecuador, but use
- >V.32bis in most of the USA.
-
- Thanks; that's very useful information. Does anybody have any thoughts
- about SLIP with v.42bis and V-J header compression? Does v.42bis
- eliminate the need for V-J header compression? Or vice versa?
- Would it be a mistake to use both? And what about PPP vs. SLIP?
-
- jas
-