| From: | Palle Larsen |
| Date: | 26 Jan 2000 at 20:59:22 |
| Subject: | Re: Memory usage |
From: Palle Larsen <p.larsen@vip.cybercity.dk>
Hi Wolfgang!
Den 26-Jan-00 skrev Wolfgang Krause:
WK>> I will have the same amount, could any body tell me how to get
WK>> that much, I miss the last 100KB ;))))
WK>
WK> Maybe it's because I haven't installed many patches :) (though there may
WK> be some really cool ones out there...), only some of which I think are
WK> basically needed (dunno if they really are, just my own guess)..
Nahhhhh.... on the other hand ;))
WK>
WK>
WK>>> But the tone is getting more and more sharp. Is this necessary? This
WK>> is
WK>>
WK>> Me getting sharp!?!?!?!? in what way???
WK>
WK> I don't mean you personally. I was talking of the discussion in general
Phewwwww! :)
WK> and the tone ppl use(d) to talk to each other. It's not interesting
WK> reading those mails as there's no real information in it. Talk privately
WK> if you want to discuss that way (ppl in general).
Could be a good idea ;).
WK>
WK>
WK>>> a ML for user to help each other not to fight against each other. I
WK>> for
WK>>
WK>> Sure, but the same bunch of ppl, still keeps moaning about the same
WK>> problem in the last +2000 letters, (without RT*M or even more easy,
WK>> just try those programs by them self, and dump those that don't fit
WK>> there needs) that is tiresome IMHO.
WK>
WK> That's indeed true, see above. But as someone on another ML suggested:
WK> read the mail and think about the content. Is it necessary to answer or
WK> is it already said/answered in another mail. Would your mail be of use
WK> or just keep the ML busy with nothing? A good suggestion I think as this
WK> would reduce such threats. And, a mail hasn't to be answered just after
WK> finishing reading it. Take some time, maybe more than 5 minutes if
WK> needed for a good answer. This gives also to calm down if the read stuff
WK> upsets someone.
Yes, but sometime it's just to dificult to just sit back, but you are right
even after +1.2GB useless crapp, about the same little stupid thing, one
should just think about unsub. there is more noice than music on this
channel ;).
WK>
WK>
WK>>> myself wonder why every window opened uses Chipmem though I use a GFX
WK>>> board, WBCtrl, and the ENV var PlanestoFast for CGFX set to 1. But
WK>>> I didn't dive deeper to track down to the reason. If anybody
WK>> know, tell
WK>>
WK>> Are you using Dopus as WBR???
WK>
WK> I am.
Then you found the problem ;), maby DopusTeam is working on something,
but then again, they might be to busy to make there program WinSuxx
compatible, if that's the problem then they will not get bored the next
20years ;))
WK>
WK>
WK>>> me, if not.. life goes on ;-)
WK>>
WK>> Let's hope it does ;))
WK>
WK> As we're talking about Fast memory loss. Whenever I boot/reboot my
WK> system the free Fast Mem always changes. This can result in one and a
WK> half MB more or less. The size ranges from 85,5 MB to 84 MB of free Fast
WK> Mem. It varies randomly. Any idea about this?
Why not see it as a game, everytime you can gues the number, you have won
something, it could be candy, cola, coffe, sex, it would make the using
of your Amiga even more exciting, and I'll bet when ever the problem is
cured you will miss it ;)))
No more OT from my corner ;).
E-Mail: p.larsen@vip.cybercity.dk
H-Page: http://p.larsen.homepage.dk/
ICQ: 15538608 Nick: SkodSoft
You cannot kill time without injuring eternity.
-- Thoreau
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
$20 OFF PURCHASES FOR YOUR PET AT PETOPIA.COM!
Treat your pet to $20 off all the food, toys & treats your pet desires when
you purchase $30 or more! Hurry! Offer expires soon!
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/Petopia115 ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------