home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- REVIEWS, Page 72CINEMALunatic Enterprise
-
-
- By RICHARD SCHICKEL
-
- TITLE: SNEAKERS
- DIRECTOR: Phil Alden Robinson
- WRITERS: Phil Alden Robinson, Lawrence Lasker and Walter
- F. Parkes
-
- THE BOTTOM LINE: American dreamers find a funny new field
- to invade.
-
-
- All right, there's this little black box full of
- mysterious and potent electronics that all kinds of people,
- good, bad and ambiguous, want to possess. The prize is merely
- the key to the universe -- or anyway that portion of it that is
- computer-driven. The box can decipher any security code and
- permit anyone, hacker or master criminal, a free, personally
- enriching, socially destructive play in this great new field of
- dreams.
-
- We all know that this kind of premise usually sets up
- movies for which audiences ought to be issued batting helmets
- -- nothing but high hard ones whizzing at us. But writer and
- director Phil Alden Robinson, the auteur of every grownup
- American boy's sentimental favorite, Field of Dreams, is
- pitching smart in his latest start: knucklers and sliders, and
- maybe the occasional spitter. The result is sweet bemusement.
-
- The home team in this movie has the shambling air of
- good-natured, slightly out-of-it sandlotters. Bishop (a
- well-cast Robert Redford) is a sometime merry prankster, still
- on the run for computer crimes he committed in the '60s; he now
- heads a marginal enterprise that does legalized breaking and
- entering designed to test corporate security systems. His
- associates include a defrocked cia operative (Sidney Poitier);
- a gentle paranoid (Dan Aykroyd) who believes the same group that
- killed Jack Kennedy also framed Pete Rose; a blind computer whiz
- (David Strathairn) whose keyboard -- and Playboy -- are in
- Braille; and a kid (River Phoenix) who demonstrated his personal
- best when he illegally improved his grades in a raid on his
- school's mainframe.
-
- It may be better not to regard this crew as a team at all,
- but rather as an ensemble of excellent actors on a goofy,
- lively lark. Sure, they gain and lose their elusive electronic
- grail the requisite number of times, often surprisingly. Their
- larger obligation, however, is not to the implausible plot but
- to their funky characters, and to the nice, wistful mood of the
- film. They all share a nostalgia for '60s idealism; even their
- nemesis (Ben Kingsley) operates out of a dark variant on those
- quixotic beliefs.
-
- But the great thing about them is that they all have an
- observant intelligence: they can see how lunatic their
- enterprise is, how silly they must look pursuing it and how
- refreshing it is sometimes just to drift away into fantasy. You
- might call them the gang that couldn't think straight. You might
- also reflect, in these grim, get-to-the-point times, that this
- is their strength, and the strength of this endearing movie.
- God, they say, is in the details. But fun, and the source of our
- best inspirations, is in the details that at first look
- irrelevant.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-