TK> How can I get this new Alas No Axis CD???!!! I
TK> loved the first album... CDNOW doesn't seem to list,
TK> can't find it elsewhere either...??? I'm perplexed.
TK> Please e-mail me privately if you have info...
NP: Buckethead "Some where over the slaughterhouse" (CD)
- --
Best regards,
Peter Gannushkin
e-mail: shkin@shkin.com
URL: http://www.downtownmusic.net/
- -
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 14:02:50 -0400
From: MorMovies@aol.com
Subject: Re: Re: Jim Black
Try New York City's Downtown Music Gallery for the new Jim Black. They were supposed to get them in stock today and they have advance copies of Zorn's IOA!
- -
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 14:12:02 -0500
From: Joseph Zitt <jzitt@metatronpress.com>
Subject: Re: satanism
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 05:16:50PM +0200, Thorsten Kr=E4mer wrote:
=20
> Here's what I did. I picked any book by Aleister Crowley at amazon.com =
and
> googled for "Thelema", a term I figured essential from the reviews. At
> www.thelema.org there's that "Book Of The Law", where it says in the th=
ird
> chapter:
>=20
> "23. For perfume mix meal & honey & thick leavings of red wine: then oi=
l of
> Abramelin and olive oil, and afterward soften & smooth down with rich f=
resh
> blood.
> 24. The best blood is of the moon, monthly: then the fresh blood of a c=
hild,
> or dropping from the host of heaven: then of enemies; then of the pries=
t or
> of the worshippers: last of some beast, no matter what.
> 25. This burn: of this make cakes & eat unto me. This hath also another=
use;
> let it be laid before me, and kept thick with perfumes of your orison: =
it
> shall become full of beetles as it were and creeping things sacred unto=
me.
> 26. These slay, naming your enemies; & they shall fall before you."
>=20
> So I guess this is only to be taken on a metaphorical level?
Do you believe that Crowley actually precticed this? On what evidence?
> >So your point is that people should not make artistic works about nega=
tive
> >subjects? Please.....
>=20
> No. My point is that people should not make artistic works about the
> negative effects of one "evil" ideology (nazism) and then a couple of y=
ears
> later make artistic works promoting another "evil" ideology (satanism) =
as
> some kind of campy avant-garde fun.
Fortunately, Zorn tends to ignore the "should" police.
