home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.xmission.com
/
2014.06.ftp.xmission.com.tar
/
ftp.xmission.com
/
pub
/
lists
/
zorn-list
/
archive
/
v03.n275
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2001-02-08
|
21KB
From: owner-zorn-list-digest@lists.xmission.com (Zorn List Digest)
To: zorn-list-digest@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Zorn List Digest V3 #275
Reply-To: zorn-list
Sender: owner-zorn-list-digest@lists.xmission.com
Errors-To: owner-zorn-list-digest@lists.xmission.com
Precedence: bulk
Zorn List Digest Friday, February 9 2001 Volume 03 : Number 275
In this issue:
-
help with Braxton's Trillium opera
Re: Avant Garde Electronica
Re: john duncan (recs ?)
Re: john duncan (recs ?)
Re: do the "do"
Eric Leonardson
Very OT: AOL 6.0 HTML quoting- how to override
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 09:31:10 -0800
From: "Patrice L. Roussel" <proussel@ichips.intel.com>
Subject: help with Braxton's Trillium opera
Does anybody remember when the following opera by Braxton was
released?
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** - TRILLIUM R- SHAYLA FEARS FOR THE POOR: Anthony Braxton
Composition No. 162 (Braxton)
2000 - Braxton House (USA), 8 (4xCD)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Patrice.
- -
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:49:52 -0500
From: Nils <jacobson@frodo.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Avant Garde Electronica
to add to the suggestions:
sub rosa: yes, a very fine label for this kind
of thing. they allow things to go out of print
relatively quick, so it's kind of an 'in thing.'
but isn't that why we're all here. :( the my
personal all-time favorite SR artist is bisk,
aka naohiro fujikawa, who does a nice d&b based
concept with sampling-collage. of course the
best bisk is OOP. but that's only imho, bisk
is all pretty damn good. also: the SR sampler
'water and architecture'--very very fine. and
3 great bisk trax on there. SR record 'cirque'
by the 'multiphonic orchesta' very excellent,
very post-modern sound. zorny mixups allover.
as for Bogdan Raczynski, stick with the old
squarepusher. in my experience, BR's lacking
the 'overall vision' that made those old SP
discs brilliant. (any SP <99) sort of an
aesthetic judgment, but SP laid down the drill
with a bit more coherence.
pan sonic, raster-noton yes.
nothing new here, but nobukazu takemura and
markus popp (aka oval) have come up with some
cool fractured sounds. i have yet to come
across a bad disc by either. (though they
really confused me when my old cd player was
skipping in its old age...)
i find a lot of the newer 'avant' electronica
tends toward this minimalist thing, or makes
singular use of waveform manipulation, a la
ryoji ikeda... not that there's anything wrong
with that, but it doesn't rock my boat. the
peak of that kind of sound imho was the COH
track off 'enter tinnitus' (98 rastermusic)
where he plays electronic lullaby sounds
around the cooing of his baby...
n
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:21:22 -0500
From: "Caleb T. Deupree" <cdeupree@erinet.com>
Subject: Re: john duncan (recs ?)
At 08:34 AM 1/23/01 -0800, Scott Handley wrote:
>Could anyone recommend a couple good points-of-entry
>to the (sound) work of John Duncan? Could you briefly
>describe what you think of the works?
The works of his I listen to the most are his collaborations. Jon already
mentioned Incoming with Christoph Heeman, but The Crackling with Max
Springer and Home Unspeakable with Bernhard G=FCnter (both on trente oiseaux=
)
are also excellent. The Crackling was recorded in the Stanford Particle
Accelerator, and very similar to some of Joe Banks' work in Disinformation.
The volume level of Home Unspeakable (inspired by the libretto of Samuel
Beckett's last work, his opera with Morton Feldman) is all G=FCnter, but the
sounds themselves are unlike anything else in G=FCnter's work. The solo
works I've heard (Klaar and River in Flames) tend more toward a single
monotonous sound that outwears its welcome, although I admit it's been a
while since I listened to them.
- --
Caleb Deupree
cdeupree@erinet.com
Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance
like nobody's watching.
- -- Satchel Paige
- -
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 17:33:17 -0500
From: Brian Olewnick <olewnick@gis.net>
Subject: Re: john duncan (recs ?)
Scott Handley wrote:
>
> Could anyone recommend a couple good points-of-entry
> to the (sound) work of John Duncan? Could you briefly
> describe what you think of the works?
I like his collaboration with Bernhard Gunter, "Home, Unspeakable" on
Trente Oiseaux very much. Exceedingly quiet and subtle, blends in with
apartment sounds quite beautifully.
Brian Olewnick
- -
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:33:13 EST
From: JonAbbey2@aol.com
Subject: Re: do the "do"
In a message dated 1/24/01 3:54:47 PM, proussel@ichips.intel.com writes:
<< And when is this mouth watering duo coming out (for us, the poor mortals
who
rely on release dates :-). >>
do will be released around February 15. the next Erstwhile disc after that,
Phil Durrant/Thomas Lehn/Radu Malfatti-dach, will hopefully be out a week or
two later.
Jon
www.erstwhilerecords.com
- -
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 11:09:32 -0500
From: "Toula Ballas" <toulab@msn.com>
Subject: Eric Leonardson
List,
Below is a very interesting interview with Eric Leonardson who I have had
the pleasure to
collaborate with here in Chicago. Comments would be appreciated.
Paul
Eric Leonardson and the Art of Acousmatic Composition
By Jacopo Andreini
AAJ: Eric, give us a short and jolly introduction about you and your music.
EL: I'm an artist who makes and uses sounds that can be received as art,
music, or noise among other things. I started doing this over twenty years
ago, when I was a visual art student. I think the connection of my
present-day activity, in relation to my past as a visual artist, was based
on my interest in recorded sound as a material for making art, for making
live art instead of static art objects. Now I work a lot as a free
improvising musician, an electroacoustic or acousmatic composer, a radio
artist, and a sound designer. I've also described myself as an instrument
inventor, but I don't have a lot of instrument inventions to show you, just
the Springboard and my personal sound studio. These are my instruments.
AAJ: What's an acousmatic composer???
EL: Like musique concrΦte, an acousmatic composition exists solely in
recorded form rather than notation. It doesn't need to be performed because
the composer finished it in the sound studio using sound recording, and
nowadays computer technologies. It only needs to be played through
loudspeakers. I first heard the term used by Canadian electroacoustic
composers.
AAJ: Another deep and interesting description of your Springboard, if you
can.
EL: I wanted to make new and unusual sounds that weren't purely electronic
or concrete. I was drawn to coil springs because they were used long ago to
create artificial reverb, and they are sensitive to vibrations. The
Springboard began simply as a way to amplify a bowed coil spring with a
contact microphone. I bought two large eyebolts and a spring at a hardware
store. The board was just a discarded piece of wood lying around my studio
space.
The contact mike was purchased at a surplus store for a few dollars, and it
amplified board to a very high degree. This led me to attach other objects.
I was fascinated by its sounds and I kept working on it, modifying and
performing with it. I wasn't planning on making an instrument, but that's
what evolved.
AAJ: How much do you think the contact mikes have influenced the production
of all this new instruments builded with "discarded pieces"? My friends Cock
ESP actually play live shows with just a couple of contact mikes plugged
into 6 distortion pedals, which allow them to have a huge amount of harsh
noise, they can move and act, and (not the least...) travel the world with a
very small and light gear.
EL: Well the weak vibrations of many solid objects wouldn't be audible
without a contact mike. It makes so many more materials and objects
available for sonic exploration, be they discarded or not. It's interesting
to me because this also stretches the definition of an instrument.
What your friends in Cock ESP do makes me think about not only using readily
available objects and materials specific to the site of a performance, but
also amplifying the performance space itself; the stage, the floors, the
windows.... If you think of a room as an acoustic resonator, like a free
improvisation, each concert will be unique to and determined by that site.
And so the room can be used as a temporary instrument.
After I perform sometimes people ask me why I made this "thing." For me it's
a strange question because I imagine, or would hope, that its sounds and the
way I use them make the reason self-evident. But, I suppose the question
deserves to be asked because I use trash, very basic and insignificant
things to make sounds that do touch people in unexpected ways. If one is not
familiar with the history of avant-garde art and non-western, or "folk"
instruments, it will seem absurd, maybe even threatening.
Or maybe people wonder why I like these sounds, or why I play them in the
way I do. I know people are surprised by it just like I was that very first
time: How can something so common and ugly make such intriguing sounds? I
usually explain that percussionists have been using hubcaps and other
everyday objects to make interesting sounds for a long time. There's usually
no time to engage about the philosophical implications.
It requires technique and practice. I played drums long ago and I have been
playing the Springboard for six years. So I have learned what the objects or
materials I've selected for the Springboard can allow me do. The more
potential an object or material yields, the more I'll work with it. It's a
physical process, no different from learning how to achieve a "good tone" or
technique with a traditional instrument, except that these objects are not
designed for music.
Learning how to use it was a long trial and error process at first. This
meant that I had meet it on its own terms: learn special techniques; how to
control a violin bow and later a cello bow. I modified brushes to get the
right percussive sounds, and I learned how to use my fingers to drum on it.
And as I mastered these materials and techniques, I added new objects,
repositioned other ones; broke some and dispensed with others. So in the
beginning years the Springboard changed a lot.
Am I rambling on too much? If you don't mind,
I think this experience reconnects me to the physical pleasure of drawing,
which I stopped doing a long time ago. I learned a new word the other day,
haptic, which means understanding or communicating by touch rather than
seeing, or some other sense. I can feel the pencil and it's pressure on the
paper through in my hand. It's the same with an acoustic instrument. The
actions of your hand or whatever part you use to play, vibrates you
immediately and you can feel the material respond back. It's not just in the
ears. You could say my Springboard experience has taught me how to hold
something in my hand and feel its general sound character.
AAJ: How does a self-built instrument influence your way of playing? And do
you think somebody could play an instrument built by another person with the
same deep understanding? (More or less I'm asking: what's the relationship
between the builder and the musician, if that's not the same person?)
EL: The Springboard definitely influenced my way of playing. I couldn't play
it like a drum. Hitting the Springboard with a drumstick makes a very loud
and uninteresting sound. Unlike the electronic instruments I was using
before its invention, it has no keyboard, keypad, buttons, LCD display, and
recently, only one knob instead of dozens. In other words, I was
unencumbered by the constraints of standardized musical instrument
interfaces, by the need for programming, complicated signal routes, tunings,
etc. There was no standard repertoire to influence me. The Springboard had
no history and it wasn't precious. So I had no worries about making the
wrong sound or harming the instrument.
AAJ: This is interesting. I've seen that you have in your record collection
an album by Hans Reichel (the world-famous inventor of the daxophone) in
which he plays an operetta for daxophone. I heard many others records by
him, and that one has been weird to listen to, because it's like as if he
tried to bring the sounds of his particular instrument back to the "old"
music. I think a new instrument should be investigated for its possibilities
to create new musics. What do you think about this? (I was thinking also
about the first theremin performances, trying to reach the perfect pitch and
play some classical music melodies and so on...)
EL: I don't think there is necessarily anything wrong with old things, but I
do agree with you. I made a new instrument to explore sounds that were new
to me. And these sounds enabled me to make a kind of music I hadn't before
in terms of its form, structure, timbres, rhythms, etc. But I'm not a purist
either, and so with Hans Reichel's operettas I appreciate the perverse humor
of it, and I'm sure he's fully aware of its irony. When you listen and watch
those tapes of Theremin and Clara Rockmore performing classical music on the
theremin it's kitsch, pure and simple.
The Springboard has also changed my way of playing for the obvious reason
that these sounds presented me with musical, compositional, and aesthetic
challenges. Some were easier to use than others. These sounds make you more
aware of your own biases and tastes, as well as you're your physical
abilities.
I have spent years working with them. I suppose that's why I haven't built a
lot of instruments. This one alone still has so much I need to master yet.
Which brings up an important point. I didn't make the Springboard with a
predetermined sound in mind, like a particular scale or tuning, or to
improve on preexisting designs. I just wanted to find out what an amplified
coil spring sounded like. In fact, I wasn't intending to make an instrument.
It's just what evolved. Regarding your second question, if the builder is
also the player he or she will always have a more intimate knowledge of the
instrument's sonic possibilities. The builder has that advantage initially,
but that doesn't mean someone else can't learn what these possibilities are,
and even surpass the builder's knowledge. It all depends on how much time
one wants to spend playing the instrument.
However, making your own instrument provides a deeper sense of satisfaction
than playing one that is made by someone else, especially one that's
mass-produced. And so I think it's most likely that the builder will also be
the instrument's best player.
AAJ: The improvisation mentality and attitude normally enables very
different people to work together. Do you think that this "language" can now
be considered as too old, ...as a language that has exhausted its
possiblities?
EL: If you think of it as a language and not a style, improvisation can't be
exhausted. It's elementary to human action. Attitudes and styles will always
change, and are changing to suit the needs of people. People get old, and
their ideas can become exhausted, but ideas and people are also renewed.
My friend Jack Wright said he thought of improvisation as relationship in
sound between people and environment. I understand the people part of the
equation and I'm intrigued by the environment part. I could add that
improvisation is way of working, a method. For me it is synonymous with the
creative process, be it applied to art or any other form of human activity.
Jack also said we are well connected in most of this playing, and when we
are not we know it. That is true for me. It can be disappointing when I'm
not connecting, because this relationship depends on trust-in my improvising
partners as well as myself.
When I improvise with people I have never played with before, in a public
performance, I feel as if I'm taking a big risk. It is a test of your
abilities to understand the temperament or style of another person in an
instant. I have to be an artist and critic without thinking. I have to
respond to my errors or misinterpretations immediately-without regret or
reflection-and go on. Improvisation is about acting without time for
thinking. I'm receiving and transmitting instantaneously. My action is
physical while my listening and interpreting happens on a pre-cognitive
level.
I could say more, but maybe I am becoming pedantic now.
AAJ: Is there any kind of sound you feel more adequate to dialogue with when
you play on the springboard? I mean, voice, guitars, drums, synth... or it's
just a matter of who's the other person?
EL: I've played with all kinds of instrumentalists, except for piano, and so
far I don't think there are any sounds-acoustic or electronic-that the
Springboard sound can't work with. My relationship to a fellow player makes
the difference. My instrument can do things that traditional instruments
don't and vice versa. It has its limitations and its unique strengths. So
it's always important that whomever I play with we listen deeply and openly
to our similarities and differences. That applies not only the physical
characteristics of the sounds themselves, but also to the way we're using
them. Some people improvisers are interested in a musical interaction
modeled on or even mimicking a verbal dialogue, others are not at all.
Eric Leonardson's Homepage, pages.ripco.net/~eleon
This article is published courtesy of All About Jazz Italia:
www.allaboutjazz.com/italy
home - mission - submit - help wanted - awards -
suggestion box - contact us
All material copyright ⌐ 1996-2001 All About Jazz and contributing writers.
All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
- -
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 04:09:01 EST
From: Dgasque@aol.com
Subject: Very OT: AOL 6.0 HTML quoting- how to override
- --part1_2d.73843ed.27b50dad_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
For those AOLer's who upgraded to V6.0 and have been scratching their heads
over how to post with quote *without* the vertical blue line AOL now employs
in their email package, here's how:
1) Highlight quoted portion of email you wish to post with your comment and
hit "reply" button.
2) In new text box (the one you're working with) right click and select
"select all". The entire new message will be highlighted.
3) Right click again within the highlighted text in the new message box.
Move cursor up the dialog box to "text". A new dialog box will open beside
it. Click on "normal".
4) Highlighting will disappear as will any HTML formatting.
- --
=dg=
- --part1_2d.73843ed.27b50dad_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>For those AOLer's who upgraded to V6.0 and have been scratching their heads
<BR>over how to post with quote *without* the vertical blue line AOL now employs
<BR>in their email package, here's how:
<BR>
<BR>1) Highlight quoted portion of email you wish to post with your comment and
<BR>hit "reply" button.
<BR>
<BR>2) In new text box (the one you're working with) right click and select
<BR>"select all". The entire new message will be highlighted.
<BR>
<BR>3) Right click again within the highlighted text in the new message box.
<BR>Move cursor up the dialog box to "text". A new dialog box will open beside
<BR>it. Click on "normal".
<BR>
<BR>4) Highlighting will disappear as will any HTML formatting.
<BR>
<BR>--
<BR>=dg=</FONT></HTML>
- --part1_2d.73843ed.27b50dad_boundary--
- -
------------------------------
End of Zorn List Digest V3 #275
*******************************
To unsubscribe from zorn-list-digest, send an email to
"majordomo@lists.xmission.com"
with
"unsubscribe zorn-list-digest"
in the body of the message.
For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to
subscribe to that instead, replace all instances of "zorn-list-digest"
in the commands above with "zorn-list".
Back issues are available for anonymous FTP from ftp.xmission.com, in
pub/lists/zorn-list/archive. These are organized by date.
Problems? Email the list owner at zorn-list-owner@lists.xmission.com