Subject: Re: MtMan-List: Providing references (formerly Audubon on beavertrapping)
It is imperative to check primary sources.
As a medical/biochemistry researcher I find
too many times that the tertiary resource barely
resembles the primary source-sometimes not
even a distant cousin.
LongWalker, I must be a pedantic fool. I found your
"natural thesis" on the mocs quite delicious. Thanks for
burning up your week's spare time.
Victoria
Ft. Worth, Texas
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 12:53:49 -0500
From: Glenn Darilek <llsi@texas.net>
Subject: Re: MtMan-List: Providing references
I am gratified that some of my posts have generated discussions of
citing references, using more than one reference, and using first-hand
references. It is ironic that for my informal research on rendezvous
food, I was one of the very few on the list who bothered to cite my
references. Citing is proper even when the references are second or
third hand. Then at least the reader can judge the value of the
information. This is infinitely superior to spouting opinion or
supposition as fact. And even far better than stating "fact" and not
mentioning resources. And don't get me started about the unending chit
chat and personal communications on the list.
I am flattered by being the "lightning rod" for this discussion. But
make no mistake - I am not a historian. I would tremble if anyone
accused me of doing serious research. Come to think of it, I am just a
buckskinner trying to do better. I have no time to seek out the
original sources other than those on Dean Rudy's web site. I didn't
even have that when I informally researched rendezvous food. So give me
a break if I only cite the books I have purchased. I would much rather
cite the work of Bernard DeVoto, who spent years researching the subject
than add to the excess of speculation on the list. I think DeVoto won
the Bancroft award or Pulitzer for "Across the Wide Missouri."
In the hope of encouraging worthwhile contributions to the list, I
remain.
Glenn Darilek
Iron Burner
Jim Colburn wrote:
>
> Washtahay-
> At 11:52 PM 9/26/99 EDT, you wrote:
> >I, too wish specific references would be shared on this list.
> Wouldn't that be cool? Wow, a list we could share serious research and
> references on! I've gotten the feeling that the list isn't really
> interested in that, preferring to rely on anecdotes and possibly faulty
> repetitions of other peoples' work. An analysis of list traffic would
> indicate this is more of a chat list than a list ofr serious research-and
> if that is what the members want so be it.
>
> >many times
> >people write tomes with no backing documentation. Doesn't mean they are not
> >right, but if they aren't, the risk of others saying "I read it on the Net,"
> >becomes too great.
> I don't think its that much of a factor. Most people seem to be just
> looking for confirmation for their pre-conceived notions.
>
> >
> >References also help judge the value of the info. For example, quoting
> >Bernard DeVoto as documentation for bringing porter (beer) to a Rocky
> >Mountain fur trade event is suspect at best. You'd be better off tracking
> >down Miller's words, then go from there. Just because a tertiary resource
> >made it to publication, doesn't automatically make them correct. Primary
> and
> >secondary will most always be more "correct." . . .
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:50:13 -0400
From: "Laura Glise" <lglise@bellsouth.net>
Subject: MtMan-List: Pancakes
12:30 p.m. PST
I'm glad we got on this discussion regarding food. It raises a question concerning a term I lifted from the drudy list of definitions. That word is "feastcakes" for pancakes.
I use this term in my novel. Russell refers to pancakes as "feastcakes." (I'm not saying that he made pancakes and turned them with his hatchet mind you.) I know that terms in the dictionary can be misleading. I had Russell refer to himself as a "bossloper," and Lanney pointed out to me bossloper was a modern-day term referring to the fur trade period. And suggested I refer to Osborne as a "lost Maine boy."
See what I mean? Honest mistake on my part but a mistake nonetheless.
So, gentlemen, before Across the Seasons goes to print . . . should feastcakes stay or go? Hey, I'm not going to have ya'll making wisecracks behind my back for a term I could have corrected before it's typeset.