> hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
>
- ----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:10:12 EDT
From: SWzypher@aol.com
Subject: Re: MtMan-List: Dyeing and Waxing Traps
In a message dated 7/8/02 9:16:01 PM, windwalker@fastmail.fm writes:
<<Mountain men in field didn't bathe.. and One would guess stink to high
heaven>>
Where did you get this information???
Richard James
- ----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:42:10 -0400
From: "Windwalker" <windwalker@fastmail.fm>
Subject: Re: MtMan-List: Dyeing and Waxing Traps
you are clipping out of context...
See journal of Osborne Russell
On 9 Jul 2002 at 11:10, SWzypher@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/8/02 9:16:01 PM, windwalker@fastmail.fm writes:
>
> <<Mountain men in field didn't bathe.. and One would guess stink to high
> heaven>>
>
> Where did you get this information???
> Richard James
>
> ----------------------
> hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
>
- ----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 11:40:31 EDT
From: LivingInThePast@aol.com
Subject: Re: MtMan-List: The last word on trap cooking{ he thought]
- --part1_152.1087bb85.2a5c5def_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 7/9/2002 8:05:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
windwalker@fastmail.fm writes:
> I can see many of you have way to much "book" reading and little time
> as a professional trapper. Traps were Dyied. read the Hudson Bay Journals.
>
This thread is interesting, but just telling us to read the HBC Journals
provides no evidence. Where's the documentation and/or citations that traps
were waxed and dyed?
It seems to me that short of that, it's still speculation and falls into the
"if they had it they'da used it" or "we know it works today so it musta
worked then" theory.
Barney
- --part1_152.1087bb85.2a5c5def_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT COLOR="#000080" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SCRIPT" FACE="Comic Sans MS" LANG="0"><B>In a message dated 7/9/2002 8:05:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, windwalker@fastmail.fm writes:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I can see many of you have way to much "book" reading and little time<BR>
as a professional trapper. Traps were Dyied. read the Hudson Bay Journals.<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000080" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SCRIPT" FACE="Comic Sans MS" LANG="0"><B><BR>
This thread is interesting, but just telling us to read the HBC Journals provides no <U>evidence</U>. Where's the documentation and/or citations that traps were waxed and dyed?<BR>
<BR>
It seems to me that short of that, it's still speculation and falls into the "if they had it they'da used it" or "we know it works today so it musta worked then" theory.<BR>
<BR>
Barney </B></FONT></HTML>
- --part1_152.1087bb85.2a5c5def_boundary--
- ----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html