> > There is a guy in Logan Utah that displays a "true" Hawken with the name
> > engraved in script on the top flat of the barrel. Interestingly the
> graving
> > goes right over the top of several pits that are deeper and older than the
> > engraving. This same guy showed me a pipe tomahawk he had just picked up
> as
> > authentic. I recognized it as on of Robert Kern's (he was still alive
> then)
> > from Ligoner, Penna. - a sand casting - and asked him how many he wanted?
> > (He paid $125 for his "original") Robert was retailing them for $4 and
> > wholesale for 50% off. People just want to believe they have found a
> "true
> > piece of the original cross" with every stick they pick up.
> >
> > Sincerely
> > Richard James
>
Dick
I don't know how well you know this Guy from Logan. But I know him Very well
and know that Hansen him self had seen this gun and wanted to trade him out
of it. So it authenticity is in doubt buy you when others seem to think it's
legit. By the way he did not pay big bucks for it he only paid $300 for it
back in the very early seventies. At a gun show from someone off the street
that had inherited it. I guess the other three Hawkins he owns are phonies
too. This man has been collecting old muzzlers since 1950. I would think he
knows his stuff And Has one of the finest collections fur trade guns, traps
and knives I have seen in one persons privet collections. He has won the best
of show at several gun shows for his collection junk as he calls it. I wish I
could own such Junk.
Crazy Cyot
--part1_135.722c857.2964d693_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">> There is a guy in Logan Utah that displays a "true" Hawken with the name
<BR>> engraved in script on the top flat of the barrel. Interestingly the
<BR>graving
<BR>> goes right over the top of several pits that are deeper and older than the
<BR>> engraving. This same guy showed me a pipe tomahawk he had just picked up
<BR>as
<BR>> authentic. I recognized it as on of Robert Kern's (he was still alive
<BR>then)
<BR>> from Ligoner, Penna. - a sand casting - and asked him how many he wanted?
<BR>> (He paid $125 for his "original") Robert was retailing them for $4 and
<BR>> wholesale for 50% off. People just want to believe they have found a
<BR>"true
<BR>> piece of the original cross" with every stick they pick up.
<BR>I don't know how well you know this Guy from Logan. But I know him Very well and know that Hansen him self had seen this gun and wanted to trade him out of it. So it authenticity is in doubt buy you when others seem to think it's legit. By the way he did not pay big bucks for it he only paid $300 for it back in the very early seventies. At a gun show from someone off the street that had inherited it. I guess the other three Hawkins he owns are phonies too. This man has been collecting old muzzlers since 1950. I would think he knows his stuff And Has one of the finest collections fur trade guns, traps and knives I have seen in one persons privet collections. He has won the best of show at several gun shows for his collection junk as he calls it. I wish I could own such Junk.
<BR>Crazy Cyot</FONT></HTML>
--part1_135.722c857.2964d693_boundary--
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
You once more have proven to me your true nature. It sure is funny the
things you can come up with.
This good friend of yours has suffered a stroke and is not in very good
heath. I was working with him and his son to get he's collection to display
in the AMM display in Pinedale. But if it is all a bunch of B.S. as you say
?? Suppose his 58 cal. Left handed hawkin pistol is B.S. too.
Dick I think if you have any more to say about my friend you had better do it
off list to me. And we will dance off list.
Crazy
--part1_145.74094f2.296569d1_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2> Dick
<BR> You once more have proven to me your true nature. It sure is funny the things you can come up with.
<BR> This good friend of yours has suffered a stroke and is not in very good heath. I was working with him and his son to get he's collection to display in the AMM display in Pinedale. But if it is all a bunch of B.S. as you say ?? Suppose his 58 cal. Left handed hawkin pistol is B.S. too.
<BR>Dick I think if you have any more to say about my friend you had better do it off list to me. And we will dance off list.
<BR>Crazy
<BR>
<BR></FONT></HTML>
--part1_145.74094f2.296569d1_boundary--
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
Barry Conner Wrote << I remember going to Bannerman & Sons in NY different times with my father and Uncles, if there had been any left handed long guns I must have missed them (probably because of the number of weapons seen on display-thousands>>
Where in NY? the State or the City, does Bannerman & Sons still exist, and if it does, do they still have such a display it would be worth seeing. I'm just a black powder hunter and shooter and have never heard of them but I love to look at museum and private collections when time, money and opportunity present.
Thanks for any info you can provide.
Y.M.O.S.
C.T. Oakes
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
> Most of the people on this list are fine stand up people. I'd enjoy a sip
>a whiskey with ya, and palaver over a nice campfire, might even argue a
>point or two.
I agree with you all...I'm just trying to figure out what he, she or it is trying to prove...This is a fine group, and I know I don't post often, because I'm in the shutup, listen and learn mode...
And I believe in standing up proud of who I am...Also have been known to associate with the likes of Hawk Pierce (VBG)....Thanks to you all for the continuing education....
Hilljack (Bill Marney Sr.)
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
Subject: WAS:MtMan-List: a few understand..NOW: Stop It!!!
Date: 05 Jan 2002 21:16:31 -0500
Hello Camp,
I posted a message not too long ago with some outside observations about AMM brotherhood and impressions given bot pos. and neg.
I usually try not to say anything to deride anyone, but Clint (since you prefer to go by that name)...for the love of Pete, stop your little game.
It is stuff like that, that makes noone want to play with you! I am willing to bet if you just let it go and started asking some forthright questions and adding decent, helpful info. the timbre of the list toward you will change. That is just how I have seen it happen.
Otherwise, I would humbly request that you withdraw from posting...or Mr. Rudy ban this person.
I do not know about the rest of you, but I am tired of going through the postings like that.
It just ain't fun no more.
Sincerely (tired of this thread),
C.Kent
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
Subject: Re: MtMan-List: Tulle/buffalo/Deer all purpose gun
Date: 08 Jan 2002 13:31:40 EST
<<I used an old CenterMark Tulle I bought as a kit and put together about 20 years ago. My most favorite smooth bore>>
Mine too, I got my Tulle from Center Mark about 2 years (two deer seasons)ago. And both seasons it has put a deer in the freezer both years. I got a mine with a rear sight (which can be documented) due to my poor old eyes. Both deer I put down with 75 grains of 3F at under 50 yards. Paul at Center Mark makes a nice, working hunting gun. I told him I wanted a hunting gun with plain iron fittings and a good strong stock (not all curly pretty) and I got a straight shooting, fast action, handsome tool that makes meat with shot or ball.
Y.M.O.S.
C.T. Oakes
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<<Wade, Here's the contact info I got off the MLML web site:
CenterMark
PO Box 4066 Parnassus Station
New Kensington, Pa. 15068
412-335-1319
Replica fusil gun kits>>
That is an old address, Paul bought the company a few years back and runs it on his farm in Fredonia NY. I do not have the address and number handy but I will get it and post it when I get it this after noon.
Y.M.O.S.
C.T.Oakes
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
Subject: Re: MtMan-List: Rear sights on Tulle & Center Mark Address
Date: 09 Jan 2002 08:50:55 EST
If your persona is strict military and you are serving in a French Military unit you would not have a Tulle issued to you from his majisties armory with a rear sight. All of the existing Tulles and Fowlers that have rear sights were converted military to civilian (I'm civilian Ranger Militia) or in the case of the quote unquote "American Fowler" were built for civilians. So in a strict interpretation my Tulle is no longer a Military Tulle, it was 'captured in the early part of the war and converted to my civilian needs, the barrel was shortened due to damage caused to the muzzle by one of those stupid french plug bayonents, and I needed to hunt meat for my family so I had the gun smith also add the rear sight to improve hunting". At least that is the persona of my favorite gun named #10.If you need at least one and you can not get to the Smithsonian collection, Neumann's book Battle Weapoans of the American Revolution shows smoothbores and fowlers with rear sights. Mine looks a lot like page 162.
By the way here is the info for CenterMark Inc., P.O. Box 575, Fredonia NY 14063, 716-679-0276, Owner is Paul and I will misspell his last name but it is phonetically "See Burt". Paul is great to deal with and as he is a working farmer this is the time of year when he has time to work on your gun.
Y.M.O.S.
C.T. Oakes
<<In a message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2002 9:35:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, HikingOnThru@cs.com writes:
> In a message dated 1/8/02 1:33:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, CTOAKES@aol.com
> writes:
>
> << And both seasons it has put a deer in the freezer both years. I got a
> mine with a rear sight (which can be documented) >>
> Could you send me that particular document by chance? I'd like to have it
> for my Tulle.
> There was a tactical at Ft. Toulouse that has apparently been juried as of
> now by one or two guys so I will need it if I am to use that gun!!! <BG>
>
> -C.Kent
>
> ----------------------
> hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
My name is Dennis Knapp, aka Sticher from southern Idaho. I've been lurking on this list for the better part of a year now. I enjoy the many posts and have learned much. It is because of this list that I have gotten interested in the AMM. I went to the Poison River Party's winter camp and annual meeting at Fort Hall this past weekend. Met some good folks and had a grand time. Hope to see many of you again. I'll try not to be so quiet in the future. Thanks again for sharing all your knowledge here.
Regards, Sticher
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<DIV>What kind of horses did mountain men ride other than indian mustangs?</DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag1_etl_EN.asp'>Click Here</a><br></html>
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<DIV></DIV>>Subject: Re: MtMan-List: new tread - horses
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 07:37:05 -0700
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Sue,
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>I am changing internet companies and just found out my site will be off line until later today or tomorrow...sorry.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>> Ned </P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face="Garamond, Times, Serif">Thank you Ned sweetie,</FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face=Times> My brother, a trainer of horses for a decade, has said around the dinner table discussions that the morgan was a good mountain man's horse. He used to debate with Dad that the myth of the stallion used by trappers would have been both dangerous and have worn out the rider. Of course, many fiction based novels would have the public accepting this as contrary to many book's mythic enchantment. Have you ran across many references to stallions being rode?</FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face=Times>Sue</FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Join the worldÆs largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag4_etl_EN.asp'>Click Here</a><br></html>
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<<debate with Dad that the myth of the stallion used by trappers would have been both dangerous>>
I don't know about any record of mountain man riding "Stallions" but I have to agree with the potential for a dangerous ride. My wife and I ride horses in company (Fox Hunting with Hounds) and Stallions are not appreciated in the hunt field. All it takes is one mare in season to create all kinds of havok. You just can't believe what it is like to have a Stallion (read that stud) try to mount the horse you are on. And when they (Mare and Stallion) get wind of each other they can be quite noisey which might attract unwanted attention from others. Another problem can occur if you get two or more stallions together as they need to establish alph domanance and that can get to be a mess on a picket line.
So if it were me I would ride a mare or a gelding and leave the stallions out on the range.
Y.M.O.S.
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="FIXED" FACE="Courier New" LANG="0">(I have not run across any reference to Mountain Men using other than Indian horses until horses and mules were used to bring supplies to the rendezvous)
<BR> Ned if you mean Spanish Barbs when you say Indian horses were used by the Mountain Men your absolutely right.
<BR>But even after horses and mules were used to bring supplies to the Rendezvous they were most likely to be of Spanish Barb blood lines. For the stock that was used was out of St. Louis. Which was getting most of there stock out of Santa Fe. and Taos area. Why even the Missouri Mule early beginnings came out of the Santa Fe area. During the fur trade there was a lot of Horse trading and stealing going on in California. With the horses all headed for the Rockies. Read about Ewing Young, Jedediah Smith, Peg leg Smith, Beckworth and Walker just to name a few the men that engaged in this trade at one time or another. These horses too were of the Spanish Barb Blood.
<BR>
<BR>As for Stallions being used well I haven't read of any being used. But I haven't read of them not being used ether. Them Indians sure did have a lot of horses for not having any Studs around. (BG)
<BR>I have used a Spanish Barb Stud on a couple of four and five day rides with a mix bunch of horses. With little to no problems. In fact I had him at the AMM Nationals this year. Course he is a good horse and you have to be aware of what your ridding at all times. So I think it would depend on the horse and ones ability to handle it. If it's a problem fix it!
<BR>I also think a horse was used at all times. Trapping or whenever for if you were without a horse you were on hard times.
<BR>Just my two Cents worth.
<BR>See ya on the trail.
<BR>Crazy Cyot </FONT></HTML>
--part1_119.b08a981.297782b7_boundary--
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
Subject: MtMan-List: Re: not historical just for grins, but true of how we all treat history at one time or another
Date: 17 Jan 2002 22:28:04 EST
Forgive me but sometimes we all, myself included get a little up tight and need a smile concerning our historical hobby. My wife forwarded this to me on the road > >From the pages of Field and Stream.
>
> (R-R-R-I-I-N-N-N-G-G-G)
>
> MAN: Hello, Lone Wolf Blackpowder Emporium, "Lobo" speakin'. What
can I do
for ya' pilgrim?
> CALLER: Hi Lobo. Filbert-"Big Griz" Stemmish here. A fella I met at
a
rondezvous said i should call your outfit next time I need to buy some
authentic gear.
> LOBO: Okay, whatcha need, Big Griz?
> GRIZ: Well, quite a bit. My outfits are showing a lot of trail
wear, what
with all the blackpowder hunting I do, plus the rondezvous and
reenactments
and such. Thing is though, I'm a real purist, so all the stuff I use
has to
be legit, you know, authentic. It's all gotta be done the old way,
nothing
modern or phony, just the real mccoy.
> LOBO: You've come to the right place, big Griz. That's our
specialty--
Exact reproduction in everything! What's your first item?
purpose of the brigades was to trap beaver, it is hard to believe they
>spent 70% of the time riding unless they could trap off the horses.
Ned, I am going to assume you have at least scouted out and trapped one beaver. Once you know how to make your sets it does not take long. YOU ever hauled around a years worth of pelts on your back??? Dang things get heavy.
>.we continued trapping on foot with fair success>
And today, many hunters continue to stalk elk and deer on foot with fair success...once they ride a horse or 4 wheeler into that country and dismount. Horses get you places you want to be that are inaccessible by foot. THEN you walk.
>>.On New Years day, 1827, Sublette (Bill) and Harris (Moses)...and set out their only traveling companion an Indian pack dog...would have taken horses if any were there. Sublette and Harris ate the dog.<<
I may be wrong, but I believe they left b/c of the dire witner encampment situation and the horses they had were eaten or killed by winter already.
I may be wrong on this one.
As far as the "larger" American horses...every kid wants a cooler bike than the next door neighbor. Cannot imagine that humans were so much more different about horses back then. It was new, different, desirable, etc. If they were less superior then that was a lesson natives had yet to widely learn. Remember the concept of the "pony raid"? Not just for glory.
And, of course, when the brigade you mentioned set out of the Arikara village they had loaded horses packed to the hilt. If one can afford it and can carry it, then it makes sense to take all you can with you. Time spent hunting and killing food is NOT time spent pulling furs out of the water...the ultimate purpose for which they were there. Plus, those foodstuffs were great additional nutrients. Also, it was good preparation for winter when snow may bind them in a camp. These guys were not stupid and thought of many things that may happen and planned for such contingencies. JUST BECAUSE they all started out walking by no means suggests they did not end up riding...as supplies dwindled and all horses were not loaded or even after they dropped supplies in camp and began to break off into smaller trapping parties. AND you quoted only one instance of the brigade walking...show me a pattern. Nah, my friend, those guys rode...maybe not 5 of 7 days, but they rode a lot. Just like working a trapline with truck, 4 wheeler or snowmobile. More land covered and more catches much quicker.
They likely had to, you ever seen how quickly an area can be trapped clean of beaver??? I can wipe out a colony in a week of daily trapping. I am sure they experienced similar situations as they worked stream after stream. This proven by the rendezvous records of packs of beaver taken back as years passed.
YHS,
-C.Kent
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"> I beleive I pointed out in the post that this was seen by James as a dangerous endeavor; studs being what they are. If you read the post initially he wanted no part of the stallion untill he saw that the Indian had gentled him down some. Ned, you know as well as I do, being the daughter and sister of muzzleloaders and hunters, people often embellish the truth in conversation. I get your drift, it is highly possible that James could have lied or told a tall tail about the stud's gentle turn around.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"> My brother, said " . . . after a horse is much older than five, dog food is what becomes it's best use. " He said that old Gable movie with Marilyn Monroe, "THE MISFITS", was hard core pacifist and 'bunny hugger' propaganda to satiate an anti-war public after enduring the enemies of WWII. The roping of the horse by Gable with Marilyn's protest he claimed was symbolicly showing the shift of rulership from male aggression toward more 'Femenist subjugation'. We really went round and round on that one as he is from the old school like Dad. Point being, he was making in his philosophical bent, was that he thought the film's message was strongly biased against the only logical use of the older mature wild horse. His words, " Can those wild BLM mustangs, and as sad as it may be, I won't put out $125 a month of feed for a worn out horse". </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">I see your point,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Sue Raven</FONT></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Join the worldÆs largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag4_etl_EN.asp'>Click Here</a><br></html>
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
>If they had horses for the Indians to steal, they musta had horses.(Logic
Don,
That is what I thought, too. But, it smelled as if this thing may degenerate into one of those "if I can prove you wrong on one point then you are totally wrong on all points" type of things...and that is not any fun. THAT mode of operation holds no logic at all.
And I do not see what my knowledge level of Astor had to do with anything at all. They were loaded to the gills when they left...but like I said...thhhpppffff! on that !! <BG>
In perusing a large number of documents regarding the fur trade, can all say that sometimes they rode and sometimes they walked and sometimes they walked with their horses and sometimes away from their horses AND sometime strying to steal their horses back.
The widespread use of horses on a dad-to-day basis is just far too widely mentioned in almost all the literature to think otherwise. The fact that such issues as native vs. american horses was an issue even back then reveals the gravity and import the horse had on the rocky mtn. culture at large during the RMFT period.
In short, this thread is rapidly going moot!!
-C.Kent
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
Subject: MtMan-List: Ned, you are right he can't read.
Date: 22 Jan 2002 19:47:33 -0800
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">And he said:</FONT><BR><BR>Dear Sue and Ned,(Clint Garrett?) </P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>> This is an open forum. Telling people to "shut the hell up" is rude behavior. Uncalled for, so, PLAY NICE!!!!!Don Secondine in the Ohio Country</P>
<P> </P>
<P><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">And she said:</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Ned, </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">I do not want to be like some of my sisters on the earth or the males whom use women's e-mails, but I beleive since it is obvious he has few reading skills that you should give up discussing anything with this one. I mean Ned, I distinctly heard you say in your last post whom you were not.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">and that is enough of that,</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Sue Raven</FONT></P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P></div><br clear=all><hr>MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag3_etl_EN.asp'>Click Here</a><br></html>
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<BR>I have not seen <I>Gretchen post on this list before and the first time she does this is how you treat her?</I> That was a real Blond moment on your part.
<BR>Crazy Cyot
<BR></FONT></HTML>
--part1_170.793b3ae.297fa936_boundary--
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jan 2002 03:47:34.0071 (UTC) FILETIME=[B0F0E470:01C1A3C0]
Sender: owner-hist_text@lists.xmission.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hist_text@lists.xmission.com
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">And he said:</FONT><BR><BR>Dear Sue and Ned,(Clint Garrett?) </P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>> This is an open forum. Telling people to "shut the hell up" is rude behavior. Uncalled for, so, PLAY NICE!!!!!Don Secondine in the Ohio Country</P>
<P> </P>
<P><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">And she said:</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Ned, </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">I do not want to be like some of my sisters on the earth or the males whom use women's e-mails, but I beleive since it is obvious he has few reading skills that you should give up discussing anything with this one. I mean Ned, I distinctly heard you say in your last post whom you were not.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">and that is enough of that,</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Sue Raven</FONT></P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P></div><br clear=all><hr>MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag3_etl_EN.asp'>Click Here</a><br></html>
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
------=_NextPart_000_2182_3b89_24dc--
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<<This is an open forum. Telling people to "shut the hell up" is rude
behavior. Uncalled for, so, PLAY NICE!!!!!>>
Thank You Don Secondine in the Ohio Country, far to often lately I have felt the urge to Unsubscribe due to the derth of egos and pointed sarcasm and the lack of historical research it creates. We all have feelings and we all have egos and opinions but my mother taught me to be polite, considerate. A buisness associate of mine once told me that any time someone got you really mad and you wanted to yell at them, write them a letter, print it out, set it aside until tomarrow, then read it, crumble it up and throw it away. It has served him well in business and life for 70+ years and it can be made to work for all of us. Lets stick to the Hobby and the History and leave the knives it the belt.
Y.M.O.S.
C.T. Oakes In Western NY
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<P><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">And he said:</FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>"Dear Sue: <BR>I think Todd said it. <BR>I have not seen <I>Gretchen post on this list before and the first time she does this is how you treat her?</I> That was a real Blond moment on your part. <BR>Crazy Cyot "</FONT></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">And she said:</FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Mr. Crazy Coyote and <U>ALL past and future posters</U>,</FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"> I will try not to lower myself to coming into conflict with many of the male archetypes within this list other than debate; something very difficult for a few. The fact I have a doctorate in history <EM>does not qualify me </EM>to berate AMM, or the host of this list. If I come across as a <STRONG>bee-otch </STRONG>at anytime please feel free to let me know. Oh, if someone has trouble with the word in reference to my gender, they might contemplate upon the sexually descriptive noun used to describe mother wolves, coyotes, and all other dogs. As a literary hero of mine, William Shakespeare used the word in his play KING LEAR in 1605. At the same time Elizabeth's homosexual cousin, James was on the throne. The one responsible for the first English translation of the Bible that some of you profess to believe in. So, if <EM>bitch</EM> was acceptable with Shakespeare, and many of my ebony feminist sisters, then it is proper with me. Besides I utilize the noun in the classes I teach, as well as allow it's usage from my students, and frequently hear it openly used in the university(not a Bible School) system. </FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"> By the way, I do believe since my father pointed out to me years ago, much of the cast in Heston and Keith's portrayal of THE MOUNTAIN MEN were AMM members at the rendezvous scene, whom played in the movie that allowed the word. I wonder how many black powder oriented fathers would censor their children from viewing the movie? By accepting a role within the movie, do not the participants give acceptability to the language and scenes within the document despite it's Hollywood distorted aroma?</FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"> My comment to Gretchen was <STRONG>'woman to woman'</STRONG>. If I chose not to go off list with her, in the same vein why did she not choose to go off list with Ned? If the males on this list can not see the humiliation that she created for her husband, then <EM>unlike my Dad, you're most likely whipped as well or simply ignorant and without 'class'</EM>. </FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">In Hard Love,</FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">Sue Raven</FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">P. S. Since you like 'blond' jokes, I'll post one for you next time sweet Crazy. Also, the married men on this list would do well not to ask me off list for my phone number, and should cease the sexually offensive remarks!</FONT></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_etl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com</a>.<br></html>
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<DIV>Question? Does anyone have any experience with egyptian cotton sheeting; ie-making into a tarp, or shelter. I found some 250 thread per inch twin flat sheets for $9 a piece. I bought 4 of them. I can make a pretty good sized tarp from these. I figured I'd wash them in hot water, to shrink up as much as they will. Then stitch together. I figure I'll leave the tarp untreated. If this doesn't work well, I can treat later...oil? I'd appreciate any input, tips, etc.... hardtack</DIV>
<BODY style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FONT: 10pt verdana; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none">
<DIV>Mike, Hi.... Yes, I've been advised that it works well untreated. I'll check to see if they have more (I bought this before Christmas). I had a 10% off coupon, reg price was $10. I got it at a discount Linens store (Linens and Things). The larger sheets were exponentially more expensive. What brought it up is a friend called tonight to let me know that Target had Egyptian Cotton on sale, he knew I had been exploring this. I like it because it is light. I have a couple of heavy canvas tarps, and I would like to have something lighter, I'm not getting any younger. Thanks for your input. hardtack </DIV>
<DIV>Mike, I appreciate the offer, and may take you up on it yet...but, if this project works- I'll not be needing it <s>. These sheets have a double layer at the top, regular bed sheet type, ya kow? I figure if I use this double layer over lapped along the center, it will be suitably reinforced? For a rope, or center stick? I figure this would provide a 11' X 14' (approx.) tarp, with a thick section down the middle of the 14' length. I made a paper scale model of this, and it looks promising. I had a similar tarp ( 12' X 18') made from an old army tent liner, and it made a roomy little lean to. Unfortunetly this was probably Korean war tent liner, and it went to seed after 15 years of use. Ya just can't buy good stuff anymore <g>. Thanks for the tips. hardtack</DIV>
Most Obedient Servant" I'm afraid I can not give you the origins. It, along with Your Humble and Obedient Servant and simply Your Servant and if religious Yours In Faith were commonly used in the 1700's just as we today use Sincerely. I have seen them used in original letters from G.Washington, J. Adams, and others in many of the collected writtings and journals from the time period. Remembering that they was a generally stricter, religious and HUMBLE training of children in the period (Puritains had the legal right to hang their children if they did not obey their parents). And class structure (at least in the cities) and civil structure dictated a civil society. So as a Christian in the 1700's (and all whites were classfied as Christians in the journals) with a humble Christian up bring you were always.....
Your Most Humble and Obediant Servant "in Christ" which got shortened (due to lack of Light, Paper, Ink or Time)to one of the many variations.
Hope that helps a little it is the best I can do.
Y.M.O.S.
C.T. Oakes
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<<it doesn't make a damn if you do have a Doctorate in history.>>
A title or a degree does not make one an expert any more than long life experiance. Depth of knowledge is by study, experiance and carefully sorting out the truth. My wife has a masters in History but she would be no expert in American History if her area of concentration was in say Middle Eastern History. (It is by the way American History specializing in 1700-1800.) And my B.A., M.A. and M.F.A. do not qualify me as an expert any more that anyone else on this list. Knowledge can be gained or distroyed by how it is researched, discussed and passed on. Anger does not teach or win converts. There is an old Japanese adage that "he that raises his voice first losses the argument."
Y.M.O.S.
C.T. Oakes
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
I wonder, if this is a sulfer compound as the name implies and it works then you may have a easy solution the next time you clean your gun. I use the black residue of shooting my flint lock to darken the brass on my guns. It is fast and effective. Charlie P Webb said that the liver of sulphur works on brass and as the residue in black powder buns has a lot of sulgur in it it may work on your pewter. Good excuse to go shoot a little tomarrow and try it. Like I needed an excuse.
I know that disreputable antique dealers have been known to take Brass and Pewter and bury it in a trench and urinate on the pit once and a while to get the stuff to age. Don't know if it works on the modern pewter which has no lead.
Y.M.O.S.
C.T. Oakes
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
>I would like to do a little opinion poll of those on the list as to what< >each of you feel were the top three skills a mountaineer could have to< >enable him to survive in the Rockies year round between 1810-1840.<
That is a very well-put question. I would imagine that it was more of the top three "tasks" he had to accomplish...these would be:
1)Finding water
2)Putting food in his belly
3)Sheltering himself from elements as needed
Same as anyone who goes in the wilderness today needs to accomplish. These are the basic human needs.
All while keeping his hair attached to his head and the air moving in and out his lungs. So many skills had to be emplyed simultaneously: observing nature, observing for man sign, keeping gear dry and in working order, paying attention to what his body was telling him, caring for his animals, making fire, marksmanship, watching the lay of the land...and on and on.
And that is just to keep himself ALIVE so he could be about the business of pulling beaver out of streams.
-C.Kent
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<DIV align=left><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">Now I've got to cross wires with both of you great men: Ned Eddins and </FONT></PRE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV align=left><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">J.W. Stephens. In that </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">Ned has got it right for the most part. And J.W.'s </FONT></PRE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV align=left><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">reference is correct. </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">The overall problem however is the ethnocentricism </FONT></PRE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV align=left><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">of the author; a </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">white man. Frequently other cultures have throughout history </FONT></PRE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV align=left><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">defended </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">their own way of living, while disrespecting the new and veiwed</FONT></PRE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>When alien peoples meet, the saying goes, first they fight and then
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>they
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>fornicate. The trappers and Indians did both, as mood and circumstance
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>might dictate. The opportunity for some great sex was probably one of
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>the primary lures of the mountains for the whites, and the squaws seem
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>to have relished it with the trapper, in or out of marriage, avidly
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>enough to fulfill his wildest fantasies.
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>The status of women in Indian tribes was low. The were property and
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>treated as such. They were saddled with all the domestic work, because
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>a brave's honor would not allow him to touch it. They were made beasts of
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>burden and traded like horses. Like many "primitive" peoples, Indians
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>made women the objects of distrust, hostility, and taboos. Their lives
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>were so miserable that some Sioux women, for instance, would kill
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>newborn girl children as an act of mercy; or they hanged themselves to
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>escape the degradation of femininity. So the women certainly could
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>expect no worse from the white man than they could get at home.</PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">As the plain's tribes generaly were matriarchal when they had lived in the east. Only when </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">they encountered the horse did they shift to a patriarchal structure. Where back east the </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">'calf pipe' story was interpreted to mean since a woman gave and taught the pipe it should </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">be women in command. Upon the shift from an agricultural economy to a zoological economy</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">with the horse as it's main instrument, the myth was reinterpreted. Since men now supplied </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">the bulk of the resources, and two men were the gender visited by the calf pipe woman, the </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">myth made a 180 circle. The males then ruled, yet partial matriarchy still had a strong hold. </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">The camp was a woman's, while the men had the earth; and neither could prevail without the</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"> other. </FONT>
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>Compared to white attitudes toward sex, Indians were utterly
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>uninhibited. They suffered from no embarrassment, shame, or secretiveness about it.
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>With rare exceptions, they had no concept of chastity, in the sense of
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>abstinence before marriage. Teenage girls and boys alike were expected
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>to take their pleasure where they could find it. (Adultery was a
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>somewhat different matter.) Adults coupled freely in front of children
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>or anyone else. One prominent chief was often seen walking about his
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>village naked, displaying an erection.</PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">The Crow were notorius for being the most adulterous of the plains and </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">mountain nations. But most of the plains tribe's husbands would and could cut a woman's </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">throat or nose for adultery. Little girls wore rawhide girdles and heard </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">stories about tipi creepers(old degenerate men) whom would sneak in to </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">copulate with the young girls. And as Ned said, the Sun Dance pole could </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">only be cut by a virgin. Thus most of the adulterous affairs and pre-marital</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">unions were most likely with the Crow women or those with a low village </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">reputation. </FONT></PRE><PRE> Public ceremonies in which men
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>and women copulated with anyone other than their own husbands or wives
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>were common among the plains tribes. And the American Indian was
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>completely innocent of the notion that something he enjoyed sexually
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>might be "wrong." "Wrong" would have been an incomprehensible concept
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>to
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>them in that context.</PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">J. W., I have to disagree as many authors of Blackfeet culture and Sioux, </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">talk of </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">a man caught in adultery and his punishment. The double standard </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">evidently existed in plains culture just like in our society's past, </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">as the man's punishment was less severe. A husband could demand </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">everything the man owned even his clothes he was wearing. If he</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive"> protested he could be killed by the angry husband and it seen as noboby's </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">business. Contrasted </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">to the wife, whom lost her life or nose.
</FONT></PRE><PRE>They were just as uninhibited in other matters where white culture
invokes strong taboos. Homosexuals, called berdashes, populated every
tribe and drew no censure; they were thought to be following visions
given them in childhood; many were even warriors. Sex with an animal
was perfectly permissible, too. So was sex with a recently killed
enemy, usually as a final humiliation. <N.B. B'st'rd: Other readings have
this, and the coupling with other than spouses, purposed to tap the
"medicine" of the other party.>
<FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive"></FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">As I understand, the berdash, were for the most part a cast among </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">the Osage. Of males whom did not have the genetic qualities to pass </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">into the population. Rather than practice infanticide they allowed </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">a class of craftsmen whom were not allowed to marry nor breed. Yet as </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">you have pointed out, homosexual males were seen as possessing spirit </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">qualities. Probably, since they were in touch with both the male and </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">female traits of their being. And the sodomy you mentioned, most likely</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">happened with prisoners and the dead. In "Hantha Yo"(not sure of spelling) the author </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">mentions this form of torture. Why else at the Big Horn did so many </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">officers shoot each other when they knew their fate if captured</FONT>?</PRE>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_etl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com</a>.<br></html>
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<DIV align=left><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">Now I've got to cross wires with both of you great men: Ned Eddins and </FONT></PRE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV align=left><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">J.W. Stephens. In that </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">Ned has got it right for the most part. And J.W.'s </FONT></PRE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV align=left><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">reference is correct. </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">The overall problem however is the ethnocentricism </FONT></PRE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV align=left><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">of the author; a </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">white man. Frequently other cultures have throughout history </FONT></PRE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV align=left><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">defended </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">their own way of living, while disrespecting the new and veiwed</FONT></PRE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>When alien peoples meet, the saying goes, first they fight and then
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>they
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>fornicate. The trappers and Indians did both, as mood and circumstance
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>might dictate. The opportunity for some great sex was probably one of
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>the primary lures of the mountains for the whites, and the squaws seem
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>to have relished it with the trapper, in or out of marriage, avidly
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>enough to fulfill his wildest fantasies.
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>The status of women in Indian tribes was low. The were property and
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>treated as such. They were saddled with all the domestic work, because
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>a brave's honor would not allow him to touch it. They were made beasts of
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>burden and traded like horses. Like many "primitive" peoples, Indians
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>made women the objects of distrust, hostility, and taboos. Their lives
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>were so miserable that some Sioux women, for instance, would kill
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>newborn girl children as an act of mercy; or they hanged themselves to
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>escape the degradation of femininity. So the women certainly could
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>expect no worse from the white man than they could get at home.</PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">As the plain's tribes generaly were matriarchal when they had lived in the east. Only when </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">they encountered the horse did they shift to a patriarchal structure. Where back east the </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">'calf pipe' story was interpreted to mean since a woman gave and taught the pipe it should </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">be women in command. Upon the shift from an agricultural economy to a zoological economy</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">with the horse as it's main instrument, the myth was reinterpreted. Since men now supplied </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">the bulk of the resources, and two men were the gender visited by the calf pipe woman, the </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">myth made a 180 circle. The males then ruled, yet partial matriarchy still had a strong hold. </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Comic Sans MS">The camp was a woman's, while the men had the earth; and neither could prevail without the</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"> other. </FONT>
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>Compared to white attitudes toward sex, Indians were utterly
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>uninhibited. They suffered from no embarrassment, shame, or secretiveness about it.
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>With rare exceptions, they had no concept of chastity, in the sense of
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>abstinence before marriage. Teenage girls and boys alike were expected
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>to take their pleasure where they could find it. (Adultery was a
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>somewhat different matter.) Adults coupled freely in front of children
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>or anyone else. One prominent chief was often seen walking about his
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>village naked, displaying an erection.</PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">The Crow were notorius for being the most adulterous of the plains and </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">mountain nations. But most of the plains tribe's husbands would and could cut a woman's </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">throat or nose for adultery. Little girls wore rawhide girdles and heard </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">stories about tipi creepers(old degenerate men) whom would sneak in to </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">copulate with the young girls. And as Ned said, the Sun Dance pole could </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">only be cut by a virgin. Thus most of the adulterous affairs and pre-marital</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">unions were most likely with the Crow women or those with a low village </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">reputation. </FONT></PRE><PRE> Public ceremonies in which men
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>and women copulated with anyone other than their own husbands or wives
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>were common among the plains tribes. And the American Indian was
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>completely innocent of the notion that something he enjoyed sexually
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>might be "wrong." "Wrong" would have been an incomprehensible concept
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>to
<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>them in that context.</PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">J. W., I have to disagree as many authors of Blackfeet culture and Sioux, </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">talk of </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">a man caught in adultery and his punishment. The double standard </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">evidently existed in plains culture just like in our society's past, </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">as the man's punishment was less severe. A husband could demand </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">everything the man owned even his clothes he was wearing. If he</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive"> protested he could be killed by the angry husband and it seen as noboby's </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">business. Contrasted </FONT><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">to the wife, whom lost her life or nose.
</FONT></PRE><PRE>They were just as uninhibited in other matters where white culture
invokes strong taboos. Homosexuals, called berdashes, populated every
tribe and drew no censure; they were thought to be following visions
given them in childhood; many were even warriors. Sex with an animal
was perfectly permissible, too. So was sex with a recently killed
enemy, usually as a final humiliation. <N.B. B'st'rd: Other readings have
this, and the coupling with other than spouses, purposed to tap the
"medicine" of the other party.>
<FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive"></FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">As I understand, the berdash, were for the most part a cast among </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">the Osage. Of males whom did not have the genetic qualities to pass </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">into the population. Rather than practice infanticide they allowed </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">a class of craftsmen whom were not allowed to marry nor breed. Yet as </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">you have pointed out, homosexual males were seen as possessing spirit </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">qualities. Probably, since they were in touch with both the male and </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">female traits of their being. And the sodomy you mentioned, most likely</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">happened with prisoners and the dead. In "Hantha Yo"(not sure of spelling) the author </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">mentions this form of torture. Why else at the Big Horn did so many </FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Lucida Handwriting, Cursive">officers shoot each other when they knew their fate if captured</FONT>?</PRE>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_etl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com</a>.<br></html>
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
------=_NextPart_000_341_336d_3682--
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
> My experience with a rig like this was that it worked well on flats, but
> when you get to hills you need to go straight up them. It does not work
> worth a hoot on side hills. It becomes monumental work when fresh snow
> falls and piles up. But then, just wandering off to take a pee qualifies
> as monumental when you are postholing piled up powder.
>
> I don't recall reading about one of these in use ... anybody?
>
> B'st'rd
Sounds to me ya needed to spend a little more time with the toboggan and
figure out how to use it.
First off ya shouldn't be postholing any where. That's what Snow Shoes are
for.
To go side hill ya need to make a trail by stomping a flat trail ahead of ya,
up and back making the trail double snow shoe wide. Then pull your toboggan
on it with no trouble. Ya do the same if you want to go up hill on an angle.
I find when going up hill pulling a toboggan on snow shoes it helps to use a
walking stick to plant so you do not slid back. When going down hill it helps
to have help so you can use a drag line on the back. You can also let the
toboggan slide up on the tells of your shoes and shuffle down the hill works
well.
Buck I will have to disagree with ya if a toboggan is made and loaded right
it can haul as much as a horse. With two men handling it Yaro hauled out an
elk hole on his once. I have hauled a hundred or more pounds on mine and
that's more then I want to pack on my back any distance.
As for reading about these being used read Forty Years a Fur Trader on the
Upper Missouri Larpenteur talks a bout using slides to haul goods on.
I think it was Sublette, correct me if I'm wrong that came in to a camp of
trappers that were strandes in the Snake River country in the dead of winter
with supplies brought in on a sled pulled by dogs. The Bush Toboggan and snow
shoes. were used by Indians tribes back east around the Great Lakes to Canada
and even used by some of the western tribes. To hall loads in the snow long
before the trappers came.
That's the way my toboggan pulls.
Crazy Cyot
--part1_9d.224abcc6.2988d9a6_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2><B>
<BR></B>(Saucy) B'st'rd said:<B>
<BR></B>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">My experience with a rig like this was that it worked well on flats, but
<BR>when you get to hills you need to go straight up them. It does not work
<BR>worth a hoot on side hills. It becomes monumental work when fresh snow
<BR>falls and piles up. But then, just wandering off to take a pee qualifies
<BR>as monumental when you are postholing piled up powder.
<BR>
<BR>I don't recall reading about one of these in use ... anybody?
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Sounds to me ya needed to spend a little more time with the toboggan and figure out how to use it.
<BR>First off ya shouldn't be postholing any where. That's what Snow Shoes are for.
<BR>To go side hill ya need to make a trail by stomping a flat trail ahead of ya, up and back making the trail double snow shoe wide. Then pull your toboggan on it with no trouble. Ya do the same if you want to go up hill on an angle. I find when going up hill pulling a toboggan on snow shoes it helps to use a walking stick to plant so you do not slid back. When going down hill it helps to have help so you can use a drag line on the back. You can also let the toboggan slide up on the tells of your shoes and shuffle down the hill works well.
<BR>Buck I will have to disagree with ya if a toboggan is made and loaded right it can haul as much as a horse. With two men handling it Yaro hauled out an elk hole on his once. I have hauled a hundred or more pounds on mine and that's more then I want to pack on my back any distance.
<BR>As for reading about these being used read Forty Years a Fur Trader on the Upper Missouri Larpenteur talks a bout using slides to haul goods on.
<BR>I think it was Sublette, correct me if I'm wrong that came in to a camp of trappers that were strandes in the Snake River country in the dead of winter with supplies brought in on a sled pulled by dogs. The Bush Toboggan and snow shoes. were used by Indians tribes back east around the Great Lakes to Canada and even used by some of the western tribes. To hall loads in the snow long before the trappers came.
<BR>That's the way my toboggan pulls.
<BR>Crazy Cyot </FONT></HTML>
--part1_9d.224abcc6.2988d9a6_boundary--
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<BR>The first toboggan I made was with that kind of thought. Made it out of what was at hand, I tied a frame together out of willows. The frame was about six feet long and two feet wide that was my mistake it was to wide. I covered the frame with two elk hides next mistake I left the hair on even with the hair laying in the right direction it made it harder to pull. The only thing it was good for was to set on once ya got it in to camp. It sure wasn't any good to haul stuff on.
<BR>A toboggan has to be narrower the trail your snow shoes make as a rule no more then 15" wide 12'' to 14" is better.
<BR>Bob Stromger had one he made at one of the winter camps last year made with the same thought in mind. But he made is right it was 15" wide and 4' long covered with raw hide with the hair off and it worked real well.
<BR>See ya in the snow
<BR>Crazy Cyot
<BR></FONT></HTML>
--part1_143.8a44445.2988ea1a_boundary--
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
<P><FONT face="Arial Black, Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif"> Mr. J. W. Stephens his confederates,</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Arial Black, Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif"><BR>It would be a beautiful world if humanity were as honest as the animals. But unlike your RMFT of the past, the individuals of the present are striving to become what was. And yes, just as you were baiting and deceiving along, only you and a few of the others were doing the same. And the only reason they were mad was because they looked in the mirror and could not see what they believed it to be. Before I, there was one whom intimidated many; now he is accepted because they know he is better than they hope to be.<BR></P></FONT></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Black, Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif">Sue Raven</FONT></DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag2_etl_EN.asp'>Click Here</a><br></html>
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
Subject: MtMan-List: CORRECTION-A BIG UNCALLED FOR MISUNDERSTANDING!
Date: 30 Jan 2002 20:12:11 -0800
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_2a85_2b84_5ca0
Content-Type: text/html
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>Gentleman,</P>
<P> In regard to the abscure post by myself earlier, please disregard. It was a terrible misuderstanding on my part. None of what I had imagined was even remotely happening.</P>
<P>"O.k. Give her thirty lashes then cut her down". And she heard them say, "AMEN".</P>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jan 2002 01:21:42.0043 (UTC) FILETIME=[A3A166B0:01C1A9F5]
Sender: owner-hist_text@lists.xmission.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hist_text@lists.xmission.com
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P><BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P><FONT face="Arial Black, Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif"> Mr. J. W. Stephens his confederates,</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Arial Black, Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif"><BR>It would be a beautiful world if humanity were as honest as the animals. But unlike your RMFT of the past, the individuals of the present are striving to become what was. And yes, just as you were baiting and deceiving along, only you and a few of the others were doing the same. And the only reason they were mad was because they looked in the mirror and could not see what they believed it to be. Before I, there was one whom intimidated many; now he is accepted because they know he is better than they hope to be.<BR></P></FONT></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Arial Black, Geneva, Arial, Sans-serif">Sue Raven</FONT></DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag2_etl_EN.asp'>Click Here</a><br></html>
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
------=_NextPart_000_2a85_2b84_5ca0--
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html
Subject: MtMan-List: CORRECTION-A BIG UNCALLED FOR MISUNDERSTANDING!
Date: 30 Jan 2002 20:12:29 -0800
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_1e44_2bbf_1c4e
Content-Type: text/html
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P><BR><BR></P>
<DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>Gentleman,</P></DIV>
<P> In regard to the abscure post by myself earlier, please disregard. It was a terrible misuderstanding on my part. None of what I had imagined was even remotely happening.</P></DIV>
<P>"O.k. Give her thirty lashes then cut her down". And she heard them say, "AMEN".</P>
I am looking to contact Red Wing in Nebraska ( I think he is still
<br>there) about a knife with a carved eagle head on the handle, I have
<br>two scouts receiving their Eagle Scout Award next month and want to
<br>give them a gift.
<br>thanks
<br>Joe
<br>--
<br>Have a look at our web site @ www.absarokawesterndesign.com
<br>Call us about our tanning, furs & leather and lodgepole furniture
307-455-2440
<br>New leather wildlife coasters and placemats - ther're great!!
<p>----------------------
<br>hist_text list info: <A HREF="http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html">http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html</A></blockquote>
<p><br>
<hr>Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a></blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------7FCFC4AFA9FF437044FC16BF--
----------------------
hist_text list info: http://www.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/maillist.html