home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Black Box 4
/
BlackBox.cdr
/
editors
/
hyperrez.arj
/
LINK56
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1980-01-01
|
2KB
|
37 lines
Semantic hypertext indexes ideas, not vocabulary <sum06 1 10>
================================================
Linguistic versus Here's the problem with taxonomies constructed from word
semantic hypertext lists -- the index was probably built by marking key
================== words. This approach only indexes words and not the
ideas contained in an information system.
"Good" hypertext should <link04>:
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ - index ideas │
│ - require a minimum of keystrokes to reach any idea │
│ - show relationships between all ideas │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
How do you I doubt many college graduates ever learned how to
index ideas? systematically find and index all the ideas within a
============ article, book, author, situation, or period. Yet,
the indexing of ideas and relationships is perhaps the
fastest way to subject mastery. Here's how I do it.
I critically read the material looking for these
concepts:
(more)
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
Types of ideas │ Objects -- look for nouns (and adjectives) │
============== │ Actions -- look for verbs (and adverbs) │
│ Events -- look for time and place │
│ Relationships -- look for connectives │
│ Abstractions -- look for intangible nouns │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Collect ideas, Once I've identified all the ideas within my material,
then convert list I use this information to construct my "semantic"
to a hierarchy taxonomy <link30>. This is the foundation creating a
============== useful system of knowledge <link37>.