home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Network Working Group R. Coltun
- Request for Comments: 1587 RainbowBridge Communications
- Category: Standards Track V. Fuller
- Stanford University
- March 1994
-
-
- The OSPF NSSA Option
-
- Status of this Memo
-
- This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
- Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
- improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
- Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
- and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
-
- Table Of Contents
-
- 1.0 Abstract ................................................. 1
- 2.0 Overview ................................................. 2
- 2.1 Motivation ............................................... 2
- 2.2 Proposed Solution ........................................ 3
- 3.0 Implementation Details ................................... 5
- 3.1 The N-bit ................................................ 5
- 3.2 Type-7 Address Ranges .................................... 5
- 3.3 Type-7 LSAs .............................................. 5
- 3.4 Originating Type-7 LSAs .................................. 7
- 3.5 Calculating Type-7 AS External Routes .................... 8
- 3.6 Incremental Updates ...................................... 10
- 4.0 Originating Type-5 LSAs .................................. 10
- 4.1 Translating Type-7 LSAs .................................. 10
- 4.2 Flushing Translated Type-7 LSAs .......................... 13
- 5.0 Acknowledgements ......................................... 13
- 6.0 References ............................................... 13
- 7.0 Security Considerations .................................. 13
- 8.0 Authors' Addresses ....................................... 14
- Appendix A: Type-7 LSA Packet Format ......................... 15
- Appendix B: The Options Field ................................ 16
- Appendix C: Configuration Parameters ......................... 17
-
- 1.0 Abstract
-
- This document describes a new optional type of OSPF area, somewhat
- humorously referred to as a "not-so-stubby" area (or NSSA). NSSAs
- are similar to the existing OSPF stub area configuration option but
- have the additional capability of importing AS external routes in a
- limited fashion.
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 1]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- 2.0 Overview
-
- 2.1 Motivation
-
- Wide-area transit networks (such as the NSFNET regionals) often have
- connections to moderately-complex "leaf" sites. A leaf site may have
- multiple IP network numbers assigned to it.
-
- Typically, one of the leaf site's networks is directly connected to a
- router provided and administered by the transit network while the
- others are distributed throughout and administered by the site. From
- the transit network's perspective, all of the network numbers
- associated with the site make up a single "stub" entity. For
- example, BARRNet has one site composed of a class-B network,
- 130.57.0.0, and a class-C network, 192.31.114.0. From BARRNet's
- perspective, this configuration looks something like this:
-
- 192.31.114
- |
- (cloud)
- -------------- 130.57.4
- |
- |
- ------ 131.119.13 ------
- |BR18|------------|BR10|
- ------ ------
- |
- V
- to BARRNet "core" OSPF system
-
-
- where the "cloud" consists of the subnets of 130.57 and network
- 192.31.114, all of which are learned by RIP on router BR18.
- Topologically, this cloud looks very much like an OSPF stub area.
- The advantages of running the cloud as an OSPF stub area are:
-
- 1. Type-5 routes (OSPF external link-state advertisements
- (LSAs)) are not advertised beyond the router
- labeled "BR10". This is advantageous because the
- link between BR10 and BR18 may be a low-speed link
- or the router BR18 may have limited resources.
-
- 2. The transit network is abstracted to the "leaf"
- router BR18 by advertising only a default route
- across the link between BR10 and BR18.
-
- 3. The cloud becomes a single, manageable "leaf" with
- respect to the transit network.
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 2]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- 4. The cloud can become, logically, a part of the transit
- network's OSPF routing system.
-
- 5. Translated type-5 LSAs that are sent into the
- backbone from the cloud (which is a separate
- stub area) may be considered "leaf" nodes
- when performing the Dijkstra calculation.
-
- However, the current definition of the OSPF protocol [1] imposes
- topological limitations which restrict simple cloud topologies from
- becoming OSPF stub areas. In particular, it is illegal for a stub
- area to import routes external to OSPF; it is not possible for
- routers BR18 and BR10 to both be members of the stub area and to
- import the routes learned from RIP or other IP routing protocols as
- type-5 (OSPF external LSAs) into the OSPF system. In order to run
- OSPF out to BR18, BR18 must be a member of a non-stub area or the
- OSPF backbone to import routes other than its directly-connected
- network(s). Since it is not acceptable for BR18 to maintain all of
- BARRNet's external (type-5) routes, BARRNet is forced by OSPF's
- topological limitations to run OSPF out to BR10 and to run RIP
- between BR18 and BR10.
-
- 2.2 Proposed Solution
-
- This document describes a new optional type of OSPF area, somewhat
- humorously referred to as a "not-so-stubby" area (or NSSA) which has
- the capability of importing external routes in a limited fashion.
-
- The OSPF specification defines two general classes of area
- configuration. The first allows type-5 LSAs to be flooded throughout
- the area. In this configuration, type-5 LSAs may be originated by
- routers internal to the area or flooded into the area by area border
- routers. These areas, referred to herein as type-5 capable areas (or
- just plain areas in the OSPF spec), are distinguished by the fact
- that they can carry transit traffic. The backbone is always a type-5
- capable area. The second type of area configuration, called stub,
- allows no type-5 LSAs to be propagated into/throughout the area and
- instead depends on default routing to external destinations.
-
- NSSAs are defined in much the same manner as existing stub areas. To
- support NSSAs, a new option bit (the "N" bit) and a new type of LSA
- (type-7) area defined. The "N" bit ensures that routers belonging to
- an NSSA agree on its configuration. Similar to the stub area's use
- of the "E" bit, both NSSA neighbors must agree on the setting of the
- "N" bit or the OSPF neighbor adjacency will not form.
-
- Type-7 LSAs provide for carrying external route information within an
- NSSA. Type-7 AS External LSAs have virtually the same syntax as the
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 3]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- Type-5 AS External LSAs with the obvious exception of the link-state
- type (see section 3.2 for more details). There are two major semantic
- differences between type-5 and type-7 LSAs.
-
- o Type-7 LSAs may be originated by and advertised
- throughout an NSSA; as with stub areas, NSSA's do not
- receive or originate type-5 LSAs.
-
- o Type-7 LSAs are advertised only within a single NSSA;
- they are not flooded into the backbone area or any
- other area by border routers, though the information
- which they contain can be propagated into the backbone
- area (see section 3.6).
-
- In order to allow limited exchange of external information across an
- NSSA area border, NSSA border routers will translate selected type-7
- LSAs received from the NSSA into type-5 LSAs. These type-5 LSAs will
- be flooded to all type-5 capable areas. NSSA area border routers may
- be configured with address ranges so that several type-7 LSAs may be
- represented by a single type-5 LSA.
-
- In addition, an NSSA area border router can originate a default
- type-7 LSA (IP address of 0.0.0.0) into the NSSA. Default routes are
- necessary because NSSAs do not receive full routing information and
- must have a default route to route to AS-external destinations. Like
- stub areas, NSSAs may be connected to the backbone at more than one
- area border router, but may not be used as a transit area. Note that
- the default route originated by an NSSA area border router is never
- translated into a type-5 LSA, however, a default route originated by
- an NSSA internal AS boundary router (one that is not also an area
- border router) may be translated into a type-5 LSA.
-
- It should also be noted that unlike stub areas, all OSPF summary
- routes (type-3 LSAs) must be imported into NSSAs. This is to ensure
- that OSPF internal routes are always chosen over OSPF external
- (type-7) routes.
-
- In our example topology the subnets of 130.57 and network 192.31.114,
- will still be learned by RIP on router BR18 but now both BR10 and
- BR18 can be in an NSSA and all of BARRNets external routes are hidden
- from BR18; BR10 becomes an NSSA area border router and BR18 becomes
- an AS boundary router internal to the NSSA. BR18 will import the
- subnets of 130.57 and network 192.31.114 as type-7 LSAs into the
- NSSA. BR10 then translates these routes into type-5 LSAs and floods
- them into BARRNet's backbone.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 4]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- 3.0 Implementation Details
-
- 3.1 The N-bit
-
- The N-bit ensures that all members of a NSSA agree on the area's
- configuration. Together, the N-bit and E-bit reflect an interface's
- (and consequently the interface's associated area's) external LSA
- flooding capability. As explained in section 10.5 of the OSPF
- specification, if type-5 LSAs are not flooded into/throughout the
- area, the E-bit must be clear in the option field of the received
- Hello packets. Interfaces associated with an NSSA will not send or
- receive type-5 LSAs on that interface but may send and receive type-7
- LSAs. Therefore, if the N-bit is set in the options field, the E-bit
- must be cleared.
-
- To support the NSSA option an additional check must be made in the
- function that handles receiving Hello packet to verify that both the
- N-bit and the E-bit found in the Hello packet's option field match
- the value of the options that have been configured in the receiving
- interface. A mismatch in the options causes processing of the
- received Hello packet to stop and the packet to be dropped.
-
- 3.2 Type-7 Address Ranges
-
- NSSA area border routers may be configured with type-7 address
- ranges. Each address range is defined as an [address,mask] pair.
- Many separate type-7 networks may then be represented by in a single
- address range (as advertised by a type-5 LSA), just as a subnetted
- network is composed of many separate subnets. Area border routers
- may then summarize type-7 routes by advertising a single type-5 route
- for each type-7 address range. The type-5 route, resulting from a
- type-7 address range match will be distributed to all type-5 capable
- areas. Section 4.1 gives the details of generating type-5 routes
- from type-7 address ranges.
-
- A type-7 address range includes the following configurable items.
-
- o An [address,mask] pair.
-
- o A status indication of either Advertise or
- DoNotAdvertise.
-
- o External route tag.
-
- 3.3 Type-7 LSAs: NSSA External Link-State Advertisements
-
- External routes are imported into NSSAs as type-7 LSAs by the NSSA's
- AS boundary routers. An NSSA AS boundary routers is a router which
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 5]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- has an interface associated with the NSSA and is exchanging routing
- information with routers belonging to another AS. As with type-5
- LSAs a separate type-7 LSA is originated for each destination
- network. To support NSSA areas, the link-state database must
- therefore be expanded to contain a type-7 LSA.
-
- Type 7-LSAs are identical to type-5 LSAs except for the following
- (see section 12.3.4 "AS external links" in the OSPF
- specification).
-
- 1. The type field in the LSA header is 7.
-
- 2. Type-7 LSAs are only flooded within the NSSA.
- The flooding of type-7 LSAs follow the same rules
- as the flooding of type 1-4 LSAs.
-
- 3. Type-7 LSAs are kept within the NSSA's LSDB (are
- area specific) whereas because type-5 LSAs are
- flooded to all type-5 capable areas, type-5 LSAs
- global scope in the router's LSDB.
-
- 4. At the area border router, selected type-7 LSAs are
- translated into type 5-LSAs and flooded into the
- backbone.
-
- 5. Type 7 LSAs have a propagate (P) bit which is
- used to flag the area border router to translate the
- type-7 LSA into a type-5 LSA. Examples of how the P-bit
- is used for loop avoidance are in the following sections.
-
- 6. Those type-7 LSAs that are to be translated into type-5
- LSAs must have their forwarding address set.
- Type-5 LSAs that have been translated from type-7 LSAs
- for the most part must contain a forwarding address.
- The execption to this is if the translation to a type-5
- LSA is the result of an address range match, in which
- case the type-5 LSA will not contain a forwarding address
- (see section 4.1 for details).
- The forwarding address contained in type-5 LSAs will
- result in more efficient routing to the AS external
- networks when there are multiple NSSA area
- border routers. Having the forwarding address in the
- type-7 LSAs will ease the translation of type-7 into
- type-5 LSAs as the NSSA area border router will
- not be required to compute the forwarding address.
-
- If the network between the NSSA AS boundary router and the
- adjacent AS is advertised into OSPF as an internal OSPF
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 6]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- route, the forwarding address should be the next hop
- address as is currently done in type-5 LSAs, but unlike
- type-5 LSAs if the intervening network is not advertised
- into OSPF as an internal OSPF route, the forwarding
- address should be any one of the router's active OSPF
- interface addresses.
-
- Type-5 and type-7 metrics and path types are directly comparable.
-
- 3.4 Originating Type-7 LSAs
-
- NSSA AS boundary routers may originate type-7 LSAs. All NSSA area
- border routers must also be AS boundary routers since they all must
- have the capability of translating a type-7 LSAs into a type-5 LSAs
- (see section 3.6 routes for the translation algorithm). NSSA area
- border routers must set the E-bit (external bit) as well as the B-bit
- (border bit) in its router (type-1) LSAs (both in the backbone and in
- the NSSA area).
-
- When an NSSA internal AS boundary router originates a type-7 LSA that
- it wants to be translated into a type-5 LSA by the NSSA area border
- router (and subsequently flooded into the backbone), it must set the
- P-bit in the LS header's option field and add a valid forwarding
- address in the type-7 LSA.
-
- If a router is attached to another AS and is also an NSSA area border
- router, it may originate a both a type-5 and a type-7 LSA for the
- same network. The type-5 LSA will be flooded to the backbone (and
- all attached type-5 capable areas) and the type-7 will be flooded
- into the NSSA. If this is the case, the P-bit must be reset in the
- type-7 NSSA so the type-7 LSA isn't again translated into a type-5
- LSA by another NSSA area border router.
-
- A type-7 default route (network 0.0.0.0) may be originated into the
- NSSA by an NSSA area border router or by an NSSA AS boundary router
- which is internal to the NSSA. The type-7 default route originated
- by the NSSA area border router must have the P-bit reset so that the
- default route originated by the NSSA area border router will not find
- its way out of the NSSA into the rest of the AS system via another
- NSSA area border router. The type-7 default route originated by an
- NSSA AS boundary router which is not an NSSA area border router may
- have the P-bit set. Type-7 routes which are originated by the NSSA
- area border router will not get added to other NSSA area border
- router's routing table.
-
- A default route must not be injected into the NSSA as a summary
- (type-3) LSA as in the stub area case. The reason for this is that
- the preferred summary default route would be chosen over all more
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 7]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- specific type-7 routes. Because summary routes are preferred to
- external routes and to ensure that summary routes are chosen over
- external within the NSSA, all summary routes (unlike stub areas in
- which this is optional) must be imported into an NSSA.
-
- 3.5 Calculating Type-7 AS External Routes
-
- This section is very similar to section 16.4 (Calculating AS external
- routes) in the OSPF specification. An NSSA area border router should
- examine both type-5 LSAs and type-7 LSAs if either type-5 or type-7
- routes need to be updated. Type-7 LSAs should be examined after
- type-5 LSAs. An NSSA internal router should examine type-7 LSAs when
- type-7 routes need to be recalculated.
-
- In relation to the steps to calculate the routing table as presented
- in the OSPF specification (chapter 16, "Calculation of the Routing
- Table"), type-7 LSAs should be examined after step 5 where the routes
- to external destinations are calculated.
-
- Type-7 routes are calculated by examining type-7 LSAs. Each of LSAs
- are considered in turn. Most type-7 LSAs describe routes to specific
- IP destinations. A type-7 LSA can also describe a default route for
- the NSSA (destination = DefaultDestination). For each type-7 LSA:
-
- 1. If the metric specified by the LSA is LSInfinity, the
- age of the LSA equals MaxAge or the advertising router
- field is equal to this router's router ID, examine the
- next advertisement.
-
- 2. Call the destination described by the LSA N. Look up the
- routing table entry for the AS boundary router (ASBR) that
- originated the LSA. If no entry exists for the ASBR
- (i.e., ASBR is unreachable), do nothing with this LSA and
- consider the next in the list.
-
- If the destination is the default route (destination =
- DefaultDestination) and if the originator of the LSA and
- the calculating router are both NSSA area border routers
- do nothing with this LSA and consider the next in the list.
-
- Else, this LSA describes an AS external path to destination
- N. If the forwarding address (as specified in the forwarding
- address field of the LSA) is 0.0.0.0, the packets routed
- to the external destination N will be routed to the
- originating ASBR. If the forwarding address is not 0.0.0.0,
- look up the forwarding address in the routing table. Packets
- routed to the external destination N will be routed within
- the NSSA to this forwarding address. An intra-area path
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 8]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- must therefore exist to the forwarding address. If no such
- path exists, do nothing with the LSA and consider the next
- in the list.
-
- Call the routing table distance to the forwarding address
- (or the distance to the originating ASBR if the forwarding
- address is 0.0.0.0) X, and the cost specified in the type-7
- LSA Y. X is in terms of the link-state metric, and Y is a
- Type-1 or Type-2 external metric.
-
- 3. Now, look up the routing table entry for the destination
- N. If no entries exist for N, install the AS external path
- to N, with the next hop equal to the list of next hops to
- the forwarding address/ASBR, and the advertising router equal
- to ASBR. If the external metric type is 1, then the
- path-type is set to Type-1 external and the cost is equal
- to X + Y. If the external metric type is 2, the path-type
- is set to Type-2 external, the link-state component of the
- route's cost is X, and the Type-2 cost is Y.
-
- 4. Else, if the paths present in the table are not Type-1 or
- Type-2 external paths, do nothing (AS external paths have
- the lowest priority).
-
- 5. Otherwise, compare the cost of this new AS external path
- to the ones present in the table. Note that type-5 and
- type-7 routes are directly comparable. Type-1 external
- paths are always shorter than Type-2 external paths.
- Type-1 external paths are compared by looking at the sum
- of the distance to the forwarding address/ASBR and the
- advertised Type-1 paths (X+Y). Type-2 external paths are
- compared by looking at the advertised Type-2 metrics,
- and then if necessary, the distance to the forwarding
- address/ASBR.
-
- When a type-5 LSA and a type-7 LSA are found to have the
- same type and an equal distance, the following priorities
- apply (listed from highest to lowest) for breaking the tie.
-
- a. Any type 5 LSA.
- b. A type-7 LSA with the P-bit set and the forwarding
- address non-zero.
- c. Any other type-7 LSA.
-
- If the new path is shorter, it replaces the present paths
- in the routing table entry. If the new path is the same
- cost, it is added to the routing table entry's list of
- paths.
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 9]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- 3.6 Incremental Updates
-
- Incremental updates for type-7 LSAs should be treated the same as
- incremental updates for type-5 LSAs (see section 16.6 of the OSPF
- specification). That is, if a new instance of a type-7 LSA is
- received it is not necessary to recalculate the entire routing table.
- If there is already an OSPF internal route to the destination
- represented by the type-7 LSA, no recalculation is necessary.
- Otherwise, the procedure in the proceeding section will have to be
- performed but only for the external routes (type-5 and type-7) whose
- networks describe the same networks as the newly received LSA.
-
- 4.0 Originating Type-5 LSAs
-
- 4.1 Translating Type-7 LSAs Into Type-5 LSAs
-
- This step is performed as part of the NSSA's Dijkstra calculation
- after type-5 and type-7 routes have been calculated. If the
- calculating router is not an area border router this translation
- algorithm should be skipped. All reachable area border routers in
- the NSSA should now be examined noting the one with the highest
- router ID. If this router has the highest router ID, it will be the
- one translating type-7 LSAs into type-5 LSAs for the NSSA, otherwise
- the translation algorithm should not be performed.
-
- All type-7 routes that have been added to the routing table should be
- examined. If the type-7 LSA (associated with the route being
- examined) has the P-bit set and a non-zero forwarding address, the
- following steps should be taken.
-
- The translation procedure must first check for a configured type-7
- address range. Recall that an type-7 address range consists of an
- [address,mask] pair and a status indication of either Advertise or
- DoNotAdvertise. At most a single type-5 LSA is made for each
- range. If the route being examined falls within the type-7
- address range, (the [address,mask] pair of the route equal to or a
- more specific instance of the [address,mask] pair of the type-7
- address range), one of following three actions may take place.
-
- 1. When the range's status indicates Advertise and the
- route's address and mask are equal to the address
- and mask of the type-7 range a type-5 LSA should be
- originated if:
-
- o there currently is no type-5 LSA originated from
- this router corresponding to the type-7 LSA,
-
-
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 10]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- o the path type or the metric in the corresponding
- type-5 LSA is different from the type-7 LSA or
-
- o The forwarding address in the corresponding
- type-5 LSA is different from the type-7 LSA.
-
- The newly originated type-5 LSA will describe
- the same network and have the same network mask,
- metrics, forwarding address, external route tag
- and path type as the type-7 LSA, however, the
- advertising router field will be the router ID
- of this area border router.
-
- 2. When the range's status indicates Advertise and the
- route's address or mask indicates a more specific
- route (i.e., the route's address is subsumed by the
- range or the route has a longer mask), a type-5 LSA
- is generated with link-state ID equal to the range's
- address (if necessary, the link-state ID can also have
- one or more of the range's "host" bits set; see
- Appendix F of the OSPF specification for details),
- the network mask, external route tag and
- path type will be set to the configured type-7 range
- values. The advertising router field will be the
- router ID of this area border router.
- The forwarding address will not be set.
- The path type should always be set to the highest
- path type that is subsumed by the net range.
- The metric for the type-5 LSA will be set as follows:
-
- o if the path type is externl type 2, the type-5
- metric should be set to the largest type-7 metric
- subsumed by this net range + 1.
-
- o if the path type is external type 1, the type-5
- metric should be set to the largest metric.
-
- For example, given a net range of [10.0.0.0, 255.0.0.0]
- for an area that has type-7 routes of:
-
- 10.1.0.0 path type 1, metric 10
- 10.2.0.0 path type 1, metric 11
- 10.3.0.0 path type 2, metric 5
-
- a type-5 LSA will be generated with a path type of 2
- and a metric of 6.
-
-
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 11]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- As another example, given a net range of
- [10.0.0.0, 255.0.0.0] for an area that has
- type-7 routes of:
-
- 10.1.0.0 path type 1, metric 10
- 10.2.0.0 path type 1, metric 11
- 10.3.0.0 path type 1, metric 5
-
- a type-5 LSA will be generated with a path type of 1
- and a metric of 11.
-
- These metric and path type rules will avoid routing
- loops in the event that path type 1 and 2 are both
- used within the area.
-
- 3. When the range's status indicates DoNotAdvertise,
- the type-5 LSA is suppressed and the component networks
- remain hidden from the rest of the AS.
-
- By default (given that the P-bit is set and the LSA has a
- non-zero forwarding address) if a network is not contained
- in any explicitly configured address range, a type-7 to
- type-5 LSA translation will occur.
-
- A new instance of a type-5 LSA should be originated and
- flooded to all attached type-5 capable areas if one of the
- following is true.
-
- 1. There currently is no type-5 LSA originated from this
- router corresponding to the type-7 LSA.
-
- 2. The path type or the metric in the corresponding
- type-5 LSA is different from the type-7 LSA.
-
- 3. The forwarding address in the corresponding
- type-5 LSA is different from the type-7 LSA.
-
- The newly originated type-5 LSAs will describe the same
- network and have the same network mask, metrics, forwarding
- address, external route tag and path type as the type-7 LSA.
- The advertising router field will be the router ID of this
- area border router.
-
- As with all newly originated type-5 LSAs, a type-5 LSA that
- is the result of a type-7 to type-5 translation (type-7 range
- or default case) is flooded to all attached type-5 capable
- areas.
-
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 12]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- 4.2 Flushing Translated Type-7 LSAs
-
- If an NSSA area border router has translated a type-7 LSA to a type-5
- LSA that should no longer be translated, the type-5 LSA should be
- flushed (set to MaxAge and flooded). The translated type-5 LSA
- should be flushed whenever the routing table entry that caused the
- translation changes so that either the routing table entry is
- unreachable or the entry's associated LSA is not a type-7 with the
- P-bit set and a non-zero forwarding address.
-
- 5.0 Acknowledgements
-
- This document was produced by the OSPF Working Group, chaired by John
- Moy.
-
- In addition, the comments of the following individuals are also
- acknowledged:
-
- Phani Jajjarvarpu cisco
- Dino Farinacci cisco
- Jeff Honig Cornell University
- John Moy Proteon, Inc.
- Doug Williams IBM
-
- 6.0 References
-
- [1] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", RFC 1583, Proteon, Inc., March 1994.
-
- [2] Moy, J., "Multicast Extensions to OSPF", RFC 1584, Proteon, Inc.,
- Proteon, Inc., March 1994.
-
- 7.0 Security Considerations
-
- Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 13]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- 8.0 Authors' Addresses
-
- Rob Coltun
- RainbowBridge Communications
-
- Phone: (301) 340-9416
- EMail: rcoltun@rainbow-bridge.com
-
-
- Vince Fuller
- BARRNet
- Stanford University
- Pine Hall 115
- Stanford, CA, 94305-4122
-
- Phone: (415) 723-6860
- EMail: vaf@Valinor.Stanford.EDU
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 14]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- Appendix A: Type-7 Packet Format
-
- 0 32
- -----------------------------------
- | | OPTS | 7 |
- | ------------------
- | Link-State Header |
- | |
- -----------------------------------
- | Network Mask |
- ----------------------------------- ______
- |E| Tos | metric | .
- ----------------------------------- . repeated for each TOS
- | Forwarding Address | .
- ----------------------------------- .
- | External Route Tag | ______
- -----------------------------------
-
- The definitions of the link-state ID, network mask, metrics and
- external route tag are the same as the definitions for the type-5
- LSAs (see A.4.5 in the OSPF specification) except for:
-
- The Forwarding Address
-
- If the network between the NSSA AS boundary router and the adjacent
- AS is advertised into OSPF as an internal OSPF route, the forwarding
- address should be the next hop address but if the intervening network
- is not advertised into OSPF as an internal OSPF route, the forwarding
- address should be any one of the router's active OSPF interface
- addresses.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 15]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- Appendix B: The Options Field
-
- The OSPF options field is present in OSPF Hello packets, Database
- Description packets and all link-state advertisements. See appendix
- A.2 in the OSPF specification for a description of option field.
-
- ------------------------------------
- | * | * | * | * | N/P | MC | E | T |
- ------------------------------------
-
- The Type-7 LSA options field
-
-
- T-bit: The T-bit describes the router's TOS capability.
-
- E-bit: Type-5 AS external link advertisements are not
- flooded into/through OSPF stub and NSSA areas.
- The E-bit ensures that all members of a stub area
- agree on that area configuration. The E-bit is
- meaningful only in OSPF Hello packets. When the
- E-bit is reset in the Hello packet sent out a
- particular interface, it means that the router
- will neither send nor receive type-5 AS external
- link state advertisements on that interface (in
- other words, the interface connects to a stub
- area). Two routers will not become neighbors
- unless they agree on the state of the E-bit.
-
- MC-bit: The MC-bit describes the multicast capability of
- the various pieces of the OSPF routing domain
- [2].
-
- N-bit: The N-bit describes the the router's NSSA
- capability. The N-bit is used only in Hello
- packets and ensures that all members of an NSSA
- agree on that area's configuration. When the
- N-bit is reset in the Hello packet sent out a
- particular interface, it means that the router
- will neither send nor receive type-7 LSAs on that
- interface. Two routers will not form an adjacency
- unless they agree on the state of the N-bit. If
- the N-bit is set in the options field, the E-bit
- must be reset.
-
- P-bit: The P-bit is used only in the type-7 LSA header.
- It flags the NSSA area border router to translate
- the type-7 LSA into a type-5 LSA.
-
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 16]
-
- RFC 1587 OSPF NSSA Option March 1994
-
-
- Appendix C: Configuration Parameters
-
- Appendix C.2 in the OSPF specification lists the area parameters.
- The area ID, list of address ranges for type-3 summary routes and
- authentication type remain unchanged. Section 3.2 of this document
- lists the configuration parameters for type-7 address ranges.
-
- For NSSAs the external capabilities of the area must be set to accept
- type-7 external routes. Additionally there must be a way of
- configuring the NSSA area border router to send a default route into
- the NSSA using a specific metric (type-1 or type-2 and the actual
- cost).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Coltun & Fuller [Page 17]
-
-