home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov
- From: roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov (John Roberts)
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: More on the lunar questions
- Message-ID: <BxDtC9.84r.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: 8 Nov 92 05:16:05 GMT
- Article-I.D.: cs.BxDtC9.84r.1
- Sender: news+@cs.cmu.edu
- Distribution: sci
- Organization: National Institute of Standards and Technology formerly National Bureau of Standards
- Lines: 61
- Approved: bboard-news_gateway
- X-Added: Forwarded by Space Digest
- Original-Sender: isu@VACATION.VENARI.CS.CMU.EDU
-
-
- -From: jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Josh 'K' Hopkins)
- -Subject: Re: NASA Coverup
- -Keywords: Ten Embarrassing Questions about the Moon
- -Date: 7 Nov 92 23:42:20 GMT
- -Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
-
- A few quotes from the text I mentioned before (Lunar Science: A Post-Apollo
- View) relevant to two of the items you list:
-
- -snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us writes:
-
- -> 6 . Is the core of the moon hot or cold ?
-
- -"Scarfy" makes some strange comments here and a few logic leaps that lost me.
- -The core of the Moon is solid. This explains its weak and disorganized magnetic
- -field and the lack of siesmic activity. This also makes sense given the small
- -size of the Moon - it would have cooled faster than earth.
-
- [Structure of the lunar interior]
- "1000-1738 km (The 'Asthenosphere')
-
- "The announcement in November, 1972, that a portion of the interior of the moon
- was partially molten ranks high among the many exciting discoveries about the
- moon. The evidence came from the impact of a large meteorite (weighing about
- 1 ton) on the far side of the moon in July, 1972. P waves were transmitted,
- with slightly lower velocities through the moon, but S (shear) waves, which are
- not transmitted through liquids, were missing, indicating a central zone of
- 600-800 km radius at a depth of about 1000 km. Either the shear waves did not
- propagate at all or were so highly attenuated as not to be recorded.
-
- "The transition to the melting zone is gradual, not sharp. The P-wave
- velocities decrease by 0.3 km/s, a slight drop compared with the mantle core
- interface in the earth, where the P-wave velocity drops by about 5 km/s.
- Thus this zone in the moon is neither completely molten nor a phase change.
- The analogy is much closer to that of the "low velocity zone" in the earth's
- upper mantle than with the core. This has led to the rather general use of
- the term 'lunar asthenosphere'. The limits for an iron core, as noted earlier,
- set by the density and moment of inertia are about 400km radius, much deeper
- than the partial melting zone discussed here. An Fe-FeS core radius of 700 km
- is permitted by the data." (pp. 291-292)
-
- [Note that this is a 1972 finding, published in a book in 1975. It may not
- be fully up to date on such a recent item. Also, this *doesn't* say that
- the zone of partial melting necessarily extends all the way to the center.]
-
- -> 9. What are "mascons" and how did they get there?
-
- -The mascons (mass concentrations) are
- -the remains of large meteorites buried under the lunar maria.
-
- "It is now clear that the mascons are near-surface features rather than
- deep seated. They are most closely simulated by surface disk-shaped bodies
- rather than deep-buried spherical bodies and show a good correlation between
- surface area of the mare basalt fill and the size of the mascon." (p.279)
-
- [In other words, it seems to be the lava rather than the material of the
- impacting body that's the main contributor to the mascon.]
-
- John Roberts
- roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov
-