home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Path: sparky!uunet!walter!qualcom.qualcomm.com!servo.qualcomm.com!karn
- From: karn@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
- Subject: Re: Registered Keys - why the need?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov9.231305.19242@qualcomm.com>
- Originator: karn@servo.qualcomm.com
- Sender: news@qualcomm.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: servo.qualcomm.com
- Reply-To: karn@chicago.qualcomm.com
- Organization: Qualcomm, Inc
- References: <715.517.uupcb@grapevine.lrk.ar.us> <1992Nov01.233637.138278@watson.ibm.com> <1992Nov3.090942.1626@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu> <1992Nov4.202104.3851@chpc.org> <1992Nov7.133526.1682@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 23:13:05 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1992Nov7.133526.1682@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu>, denning@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu writes:
- |> Law enforcers would not be able to activate a tap.
- [...]
- |> My understanding is that the phone companies keep an audit of all taps.
-
- Lest this seem a little too reassuring, I would like to quote one of
- the members of the industry committee that established the standards
- for authentication and "privacy" for the new generation of digital
- cellular telephones. I asked why the government was so strongly
- opposed to the secure encryption of the over-the-air part of a
- cellular call when they could still go to the telephone company and
- tap the land side of the call where it connects with the regular
- public telephone network.
-
- The response? A warrant would be required to gain the telephone
- company's assistance, and warrants were considered to be "too
- impractical" in many cases.
-
- Draw your own conclusions. Professor Denning ought to spend some time
- in the real world before making proposals that implicitly trust the
- government to follow its own rules.
-
- Phil
-
-