home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.crypt:4354 comp.org.eff.talk:6780 alt.privacy:2096 talk.politics.guns:23526
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt,comp.org.eff.talk,alt.privacy,talk.politics.guns
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!batcomputer!genie!starr
- From: starr@genie.slhs.udel.edu (Tim Starr)
- Subject: Re: Registering "Assault Keys"
- Message-ID: <1992Nov5.083435.781@genie.slhs.udel.edu>
- Organization: UDel, School of Life & Health Sciences
- References: <1cs7qlINN29t@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <1992Nov2.104157.21010@genie.slhs.udel.edu> <CKD.92Nov2104215@loiosh.eff.org>
- Distribution: inet
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 08:34:35 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <CKD.92Nov2104215@loiosh.eff.org> ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis) writes:
- }Tim> == Tim Starr <starr@genie.slhs.udel.edu>
- }
- } Tim> You're apparently ignorant of any distinction between
- } Tim> command-and-control regulation from the "public sector" and
- } Tim> contractual terms in the "private sector". You don't have to deal
- } Tim> with RSA if you don't consent to it. If you refuse to deal with
- } Tim> the government, it deals with you.
- }
- }What if RSA brings a patent infringement suit against you? It's not as
- }simple as you paint it. You can't simply "refuse to deal" with RSA if
- }you're using public key encryption in the US.
-
- What I meant was that you don't have to use public key encryption. Patents
- are irrelevant (and I don't believe in 'em, anyways. Copyright, yes, patents,
- no). You and RSA are both freely contracting parties. However, if you want
- to use RSA in a prohibited fashion, you have no choice about whether you will
- deal with the enforcement agency of that prohibition.
-
-
- Tim Starr - Renaissance Now! - Think Universally, Act Selfishly
- starr@genie.slhs.udel.edu
-
- "True greatness consists in the use of a powerful understanding to enlighten
- oneself and others." - Voltaire
-