home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!zazen!psl.wisc.edu!lonetree.physics.wisc.edu!nicklaus
- From: nicklaus@lonetree.physics.wisc.edu (Dennis Nicklaus)
- Newsgroups: misc.consumers
- Subject: Re: Baby Monitors - Any suggestions?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov11.194915.26051@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu>
- Date: 11 Nov 92 19:49:15 GMT
- Article-I.D.: pslu1.1992Nov11.194915.26051
- References: <1992Nov6.155411.6474@bcrka451.bnr.ca> <1992Nov9.155724.29822@mcc.com>
- Sender: news@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: High Energy Physics
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <1992Nov9.155724.29822@mcc.com>, srogers@teenwolf.mcc.com (Steve Rogers) writes:
- |> We recently replaced our old baby monitor (a Gerry) with a Sony. The
- |> is in use. I would NEVER have thought they would put two such devices
- |> on the same frequency - something to think about.
-
- You obviously don't watch enough bad TV movies!
- There was one a year or two, starring my all-time favorite actress, Teri Garr,
- with a plot that involved a woman overhearing (on a clown-shaped baby monitor)
- her neighbor plotting to kill his wife over a cordless phone. (He
- was plotting with the woman with whom he was having an affair, or some
- silly soap-opera kindo of thing.) Not one of Ms. Garr's finer parts, I'm afraid.
- (Of course, she was great within the confines of a pretty silly story.)
-