home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky misc.activism.progressive:8299 alt.activism:18607 soc.culture.latin-america:4256
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ukma!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!daemon
- From: harelb@math.cornell.edu (misc.activism.progressive co-moderator)
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive,alt.activism,soc.culture.latin-america
- Subject: Was NICARAGUA MORE DEMOCRATIC THAN THE U.S.?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov11.105949.28134@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Date: 11 Nov 92 10:59:49 GMT
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Organization: misc.activism.progressive on UseNet ; ACTIV-L@UMCVMB
- Lines: 104
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Originator: daemon@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
-
- Was NICARAGUA MORE DEMOCRATIC THAN THE U.S.?
-
-
- "...Others have shown that by every standard, Nicaragua's elections
- have been more open and democratic than El Salvador's and its society
- more humane than most others in Latin America.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- "Indeed it can be further argued that by every standard Nicaragua
- is a more democratic society than the one waging aggression
- against -- and I do not mean Honduras [...]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
-
- ========================================================
- I s N i c a r a g u a M o r e D e m o c r a t i c
- ========================================================
- T h a n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s ?
- ========================================================
- By Michael Parenti (*)
-
- [From: Covert Action Information Bulletin, Number 26, Summer 1986]
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- --> [Send the 1-line message GET FAIRNESS NICA-USA ACTIV-L to]
- [LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.BITNET for a copy of this file. ]
-
- --> [Send GET ACTIV-L ARCHIVE ACTIV-L to above address for a ]
- [listing with brief descriptions of other files available]
-
- [To get a file named FILE NAME from the archiver (files are ]
- [two words separated by a space), send the 1-line message: ]
-
- --> GET FILE NAME ACTIV-L
-
- to: LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.BITNET [or: LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.MISSOURI.EDU]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- To justify the policies of attack, encirclement, embargo, and
- destabilization directed against Nicaragua, the Reagan administration
- has charged that the Sandinista government is on the road to
- totalitarianism, that it denies religious and political freedom and is
- a threat to the security of its neighbors. The goal of U.S. policy,
- claims President Reagan, is to bring about a pluralistic open society
- in Nicaragua, a goal that never loomed very large during the fifty
- years of the Somoza dictatorship. More recently in a book on the
- Nicaraguan revolution, journalist Shirley Christian echoed this line,
- arguing that the contra war was a justifiable attempt ''to force the
- Sandinista Front into accepting major structural changes toward an
- open political society.''
-
- In response to this position, supporters of the Sandinista revolution
- have argued that Nicaragua does have a pluralistic society, is
- attempting to make a better life for its people, has no aggressive
- designs upon its neighbors, and instead is itself being invaded along
- two of it borders. Others have shown that by every standard,
- Nicaragua's elections have been more open and democratic than El
- Salvador's and its society more humane than most others in Latin
- America.
-
- Indeed it can be further argued that by every standard Nicaragua is a
- more democratic society than the one waging aggression against -- and
- I do not mean Honduras. By every major democratic criterion, Nicaragua
- comes off looking better than the United States. Let us begin with a
- comparison of the national elections held in November 1984 in both the
- United States and Nicaragua [1]
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- [1] Much of the information regarding the 1984 Nicaraguan national election
- is from ``Their Vote Decided'' a report by the Committee of U.S Citizens
- Living in Nicaragua (CUSCLIN, Managua, Nicaragua).
-
- (*) Michael Parenti writes and lectures frequently on U.S. domestic and
- foreign politics. His most recent book is _Inventing Reality: The
- Politics of the Mass Media_ (New York: St Martin's Press, 1986).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- [Parenti does not, by any means, attempt a thoroughly ]
- [documented and multi-sourced presentation to convince his ]
- [readers of the fairness of the Nicaraguan elections (and ]
- [related factors, e.g. U.S. subversion), and indeed the ]
- [evidence is much stronger than that presented here. ]
- --> [Use the GET command (see top) with NICA-84 ELECTION for ]
- [such documentation; some additional background is found ]
- [also in NICRAGUA ELECTION, an extensive report on U.S. ]
- [subversion of the 1990 Nicaraguan elections ]
-
-
-
- ======================================
- To get a file named FILE NAME from the
- archiver (files are two words separa-
- ted by a space), send the 1-line message
-
- GET FILE NAME ACTIV-L
-
- to: LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.BITNET
- [or: LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.MISSOURI.EDU]
- ======================================
-
- Use GET with the file ACTIV-L ARCHIVE for a listing of
- files available with the GET command.
-
- e.g., send GET ACTIV-L ARCHIVE ACTIV-L to LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.BITNET to be
- emailed the index of archived files.
-