home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.windows.open-look
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!att-out!cbnewsh!merlin!wolf
- From: wolf@merlin.mt.att.com (Thomas Wolf)
- Subject: Re: MailTool3 and .signature files
- Reply-To: wolf@merlin.mt.att.com
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 14:02:48 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov12.140248.3160@cbnewsh.cb.att.com>
- References: <1992Nov12.130627.4118@cas.org>
- Sender: news@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (NetNews Administrator)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: merlin.mt.att.com
- Lines: 17
-
- All these suggestions are great (I've been using the "template" method since
- the last time this question was asked/answered.) But in general, I think it's
- ridiculous that a newer version of a product has less capabilities than an older
- one. Why should I have to press a single key/button to get a signature when, in
- the past I didn't? Having this template capability is all good and appreciated,
- but at the cost of losing previous capabilities? I don't know...
-
- Just my $.02.
- Tom
-
- ---
- +----------------------------------------+ ..I've been told my signature lacked
- | Thomas Wolf | (908) 957-3955 | originality...Of course it does!
- | Bell Labs, NJ | wolf@merlin.mt.att.com | I'm a conservationist - and
- | MT 4D-213 | wolf@jolt.att.com | originality, in my case, is a
- +----------------------------------------+ an extremely limited resource...
-
-