home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!pki-nbg!dok_hfa
- From: dok_hfa@sovb50pki-nbg.philips.de (Hans-Juergen Faerber)
- Newsgroups: comp.text.frame
- Subject: Re: Indexing: Is There A Better Way?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov13.135047@sovb50pki-nbg.philips.de>
- Date: 13 Nov 92 12:50:47 GMT
- References: <STEVENO.92Nov3100350@novadyne.unidata.com> <1992Nov12.232417.29184@sfu.ca>
- Sender: news@pki-nbg.philips.de
- Reply-To: dok_hfa@pki-nbg.philips.de
- Organization: Philips Communication Systems, Nuremberg, Germany
- Lines: 27
-
-
- In article <1992Nov12.232417.29184@sfu.ca>, Mike_Dustan@sfu.ca (Mike Dustan) writes:
- |>
- |> The problem of indexing ranges becomes somewhat easier if you use the
- |> <$autorange> component in your index format. Just include it before or
- |> after the <$pagenum> for each index level on the reference page, and
- |> Frame will automatically concatenate entries from consecutive pages into
- |> a range-type entry. For example, "widgets 2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11" becomes
- |> "widgets 2-9, 10-11".
- |>
- |> Cheers
- |> Mike Dustan, Computing Services, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC
- |> Canada
-
- That's right so far. But I noticed some days ago that the <$autorange>
- option disturbs the <$nopage> option. If you have turned <$autorange> on,
- <$nopage> suddenly has no effect.
-
- Has anyone else seen this?
-
- h.-j.
-
- --
- | Philips Kommunikations |Voice: +49 911 5262974
- | Industrie AG |Fax: +49 911 5263545
- Hans-Juergen Faerber| Techn. Documentation |E-Mail:
- | Nuremberg, Germany |dok_hfa@pki-nbg.philips.de
-