home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!bwilliam
- From: bwilliam@iat.holonet.net (Bill Williams)
- Subject: Re: True OOP languages
- Message-ID: <BxL7C4.3MM@iat.holonet.net>
- Organization: HoloNet (BBS: 510-704-1058)
- References: <1992Nov11.171645.1@wombat.newcastle.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 05:02:27 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- Operator overloading could concevably be done with a large preprocessing
- system so therefore should not be a good limiting factor in declaring any
- language more or less object oriented.
-
- A Better set of high-end criteria would be : DOES THE THING SUPPORT
- MULTIPLE INHERITENCE?
-
- Another good criteria is : DOES THE LANGUAGE SUPPORT DYNAMIC BINDING (As
- the Objective-C language evidently does)?
-
- Some languages can be stretched slightly to become better object oriented
- languages : Ada with DRAGOON, Modula-3, etc.
-
-
- Bill Williams
-
-