home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watserv1!mansci1.UWaterloo.ca!ajrooks
- From: ajrooks@mansci1.UWaterloo.ca (Alan Rooks)
- Subject: Re: LOADALL and the 486
- Message-ID: <Bx9A8o.I23@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>
- Sender: news@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- References: <1992Nov04.155003.25751@apricot.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 18:33:59 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- marcusj@apricot.co.uk (Marcus Jenkins) writes:
- >I know this may be an FAQ, but I am just a little confused. Is
- >LOADALL implemented in the 486?
-
- [more stuff about LOADALL, asks for email answers]
-
- FAQ or no, could someone post or give references for the documented
- "undocumented" instructions? Someone else mentioned bit-string ops on
- the 386.
-
- Thanks in advance,
- Alan Rooks University of Waterloo ajrooks@mansci1.uwaterloo.ca
-