home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!dkuug!daimi!u920659
- From: u920659@daimi.aau.dk (Carsten S|rensen)
- Subject: Re: Assemblers, which is the best please?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov9.085124.19479@daimi.aau.dk>
- Sender: u920659@daimi.aau.dk (Carsten S|rensen)
- Organization: DAIMI: Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, Denmark
- References: <1860@newsserver.cs.uwindsor.ca> <1992Nov4.084155.21574@daimi.aau.dk> <1992Nov9.031414.22628@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Distribution: comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 08:51:24 GMT
- Lines: 32
-
- eeklund@nyx.cs.du.edu (Eivind Eklund) writes:
-
- >Here you are getting more and more demo-coders to disagree with you.
- >AsmOne is lacking an OK debugger.
-
- It serves my needs perfectly. And I think that most democoders here in
- Denmark uses ASM-One.
-
- >> ASM-ONE also has a source-level debugger which is
- >>VERY nice indeed.
- >
- >This statement obviously comes from an old user of SEKA. That debugger is
-
- Of course I used SEKA. When you have used SEKA the only true assembler is
- ASM-One due to the fact that they are alike in the way they operate.
-
- >I feel that the ultimate developement is DevPac running with CED as
- >editor. I am running this through a self-written interface, meaning I get
- >devpac asm to memory from inside CED.
-
- And you lose some mem. Not a problem for most of us but for a guy running
- One or two floppy's and only 1 meg of mem, he will chose ASM-One
-
- >Eivind Eklund aka Vishnu CRB
- >eeklund@nyx.cs.du.edu Phone: +47-(0)-9-944946 (BBS. shout to get ME!)
-
- Carsten Soerensen
-
- Slammer/Anarchy
-
- u920659@daimi.aau.dk
-
-