home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sunic!seunet!kullmar!piraya!overdose!Roger_Nordin
- From: Roger_Nordin@atb.bbs.bad.se (Roger Nordin)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
- Subject: Re: US Robotics New modem
- Message-ID: <OD.6badnetOA92-901-302p0_52e4fb59@piraya.bad.se>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 21:15:28 +0000
- References: <1992Nov3.095652.7929@henson.cc.wwu.edu>
- Sender: BadNet@piraya.bad.se
- Reply-To: Roger_Nordin@atb.bbs.bad.se (Roger Nordin)
- Distribution: world
- Organization: ANet Test Bench, Karlstad, Sweden
- OD-Comment-To: Internet_Gateway
- Lines: 21
-
- > Bssst... Sorry, wrong.
-
- I don't think so!
-
- > The problem I am describing is not a mild one. I realize that HST protocol
- > can be a bit sluggish in interactive responce. But when the patched
- Sporster> answers the line, the responce is rediculous. When typing, it often
- takes
- > several seconds for a character to be echoed back.
-
- Yes, I *know* that. But as I said, it's not *always* the case with a patched
- Sportster. Far from that! Belive me, I have seen it with my own eyes.
-
- What actually controls this behaviour, is a good question, though. I have a
- patched Courier V.32bis here, which runs 16k8-HST just fine.
-
- _ . __
- Roger Nordin _ // /!Net /est Bench
- 2:203/602.0@fidonet \X/ Internet: Roger_Nordin@bad.se
-
- ---
-