home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #26 / NN_1992_26.iso / spool / comp / os / os2 / misc / 35554 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-07  |  1015 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!olivea!sgigate!sgiblab!cs.uoregon.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!sumax!kwoelfel
  2. From: kwoelfel@sumax.seattleu.edu (Kimball Woelfel)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
  4. Subject: Re: Try this (I *LOVE* OS/2 2.x) ...
  5. Message-ID: <5656@sumax.seattleu.edu>
  6. Date: 6 Nov 92 05:40:15 GMT
  7. References: <Bx3ut7.Jqq@andy.bgsu.edu> <Bx3xnJ.AIx@news.iastate.edu> <steveh.720844299@godzilla.cgl.citri.edu.au>
  8. Organization: Seattle University, Seattle WA
  9. Lines: 10
  10.  
  11. In article <steveh.720844299@godzilla.cgl.citri.edu.au> steveh@cgl.citri.edu.au (Steven Hayes) writes:
  12. >jws@iastate.edu (James William Shoemaker) writes:
  13. >
  14. >>    I use TE/2 with Zmodem all the time and get respectable throughput
  15. >>(around 1000 k/s +- 100k/s).  What did you not like about te/2 that your
  16. >>DOS program gave you, I moved from Procomm + to TE/2 and don't miss anything.
  17. >
  18. >Isn't TE/2's VT100 emulation real bad?
  19.  
  20.  I thought so.  went back to Procomm + myself because of the TE/2 VT100 emulation.  yuck!
  21.