home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.linux:15956 gnu.misc.discuss:3554
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!att-out!rutgers!usc!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!danielce
- From: danielce@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (Daniel AMP Carosone)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,gnu.misc.discuss
- Subject: Re: The Sega Lawsuit and Diamond
- Message-ID: <danielce.721106986@munagin>
- Date: 7 Nov 92 03:29:46 GMT
- References: <1992Nov3.215919.17713@menudo.uh.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU
- Followup-To: gnu.misc.discuss
- Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
- Lines: 56
-
- cosc17zz@menudo.uh.edu (Daniel Supernaw-Issen) writes:
-
- >Last night the following occured to me. Given that Sega lost its lawsuit
- >resulting in a ruling that allowed the dissassembly of ROMs for the purposes
- >of creating an interfacing product, why can't Diamonds ROMs be similarly
- >disassembled? It seems to me that in light of the ruling, Xfree could in
- >fact support diamond products WITHOUT signing a non-disclosure agreement and
- >without compromising the copy-left.
-
-
- Technically speaking it could be, but probably won't for two reasons
- (at least):
-
- 1) Diamond would probably sue *anyway*, would probably lose (provided
- you have the funds to meet them in court), and would probably even
- consider the legal fees money well spent on closing you down.
- Frankly, if they sued, they might even win on default, since
- linuxers wouldn't be able to afford to fight them in court.
- Remember that the SEGA case above was between two large commercial
- operations, fighting for revenues from games sales, so the legal
- fees are worth spending (to them).
-
- 2) Doing so would totally miss the point. Diamond has decided to try
- and keep the programming information secret, made up non-disclosure
- agreements for people to sign, and gone to a whole lot of trouble
- to prevent software developers having free (or even moderately
- easy) access to it. The end result can only be fewer software
- packages able to drive the card (Free, Commercial, or otherwise)
- and therefore fewer sales of the card -- their choice. If they
- want things this way, Free Software developers should *make a
- point* not to support the product, even if they can get access to
- the information via other means, to discourage such a narrow-minded
- corporate attitude. Try and find out why GNU is boycotting Apple
- for another example.
-
-
- This is rather rough on people who already have these cards -- but
- that's a natural consequence of Diamond's policies. For those people,
- I can only suggest trying to get your card exchanged for another, and
- writing to Diamond explaining exactly *why* you are doing so. Do this
- even if someone does reverse-engineer a driver to help those who
- cannot change cards.
-
- There are other S3-based cards on the market, some cheaper (and some
- of those even reportedly faster, but I don't know - I suppose someone
- has to pay for Diamond's lawyers), for which programming information
- is readily available, and which will be supported.
-
-
-
- (Crossposted to gnu.misc.discuss, and followups to there)
-
- _______________________________________________________________________________
- Daniel AMP Carosone. email: danielce@ee.mu.oz.au snail: 37 Wandin Road
- Computer/Software Eng, IRC: Waftam Camberwell 3124
- University of Melbourne. Vox: +61 3 882 8910 Australia
-