home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sun-barr!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!gdt!uwe-bristol!slave.uwe.ac.uk!root
- From: root@slave.uwe.ac.uk (Operator (Phil/Dylan))
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: Olvwm: Anybody played with it?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov5.153650.10201@csd.uwe.ac.uk>
- Date: 5 Nov 92 15:36:50 GMT
- References: <720750555snz@rama.demon.co.uk> <1992Nov3.233913.10939@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
- Sender: usenet@csd.uwe.ac.uk (uwe nntp usenet poster)
- Reply-To: p_copela@csd.uwe.ac.uk
- Organization: The New University in the West of England, Bristol (WEB)
- Lines: 16
- Nntp-Posting-Host: usenet@csd.uwe.ac.uk (uwe nntp usenet poster)
-
- In article <1992Nov3.233913.10939@uoft02.utoledo.edu>,
- billp@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu (Bill Parquet) writes:
-
- |> Before I undertake re-compiling olvwm, is there a version already out there
- |> that uses the new X386 2.1 shared libraries? (the one i got from sunsite
- |> expected libX11.1.1 or something like that)
-
- yes,... I'm running olvwm with X386 2.1 shared libraries although there seems
- to
- be a very small irritating bug where it doesn't always 'clean' overwrites
- correctly
- leaving speckles of pixels on the screen,.. it may be a fault of the speedup
- code
-
- Phil
- =--=
-