home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #26 / NN_1992_26.iso / spool / comp / object / 4171 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-08  |  1.0 KB  |  27 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.object
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!think.com!rpi!night
  3. From: night@acm.rpi.edu (Trip Martin)
  4. Subject: Re: objects and closures
  5. Message-ID: <w9l1smp@rpi.edu>
  6. Nntp-Posting-Host: hermes.acm.rpi.edu
  7. Reply-To: night@acm.rpi.edu
  8. References: <1992Oct27.205320.13271@twg.com> <9210302223.AA11001@cs.columbia.edu>     <720756315@sheol.UUCP> <Bx5DFt.7z3@dcs.ed.ac.uk>     <BEVAN.92Nov3182229@hippo.cs.man.ac.uk> <720937337@sheol.UUCP>     <Bx8zy5.4n5@dcs.ed.ac.uk> <BEVAN.92Nov7123646@hippo.cs.man.ac.uk>
  9. Distribution: na
  10. Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 16:41:30 GMT
  11. Lines: 14
  12.  
  13. In <BEVAN.92Nov7123646@hippo.cs.man.ac.uk> bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan) writes:
  14.  
  15. >I realise that this is comp.object, however I would hope that most
  16. >readers are not so partisan as think reuse implies OOP.  There are
  17. >many ways to reuse code, inheriting from it is only _one_ method and I
  18. >would venture not even the dominant one, even in OOL programs.
  19.  
  20. What other methods of reuse are there?
  21. -- 
  22. Trip Martin
  23. night@acm.rpi.edu
  24. --
  25. Trip Martin
  26. night@acm.rpi.edu
  27.