home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.cell-relay
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!iscnvx!news
- From: myoung@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
- Subject: Re: Big Cell App
- Message-ID: <1992Nov5.162041.17042@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com>
- Sender: news@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com (News)
- Reply-To: myoung@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
- Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California
- References: <1992Nov3.164731.12244@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com>,<9231017.24378@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 16:20:41 GMT
- Lines: 37
-
- In article <9231017.24378@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>, gja@mullian.ee.mu.oz.au (Grenville Armitage) writes:
-
- >As an aside - I've seen many invented scenarios and questions posed
- >by you ( Matt) in this newsgroup over the last few months. Could you
- >summaries your own answers to your questions, or the answers others
- >have given?
- >
- >gja
-
- Boy you got me there! Most all of the responses have been posted and I
- have not extracted them and organized them, sorry.
-
- The ones who responded via personal mail had the following comments:
-
- 1) Possibly some other high speed network standard might emerge which
- involves high speed switching of variable length frames in some fashion.
- (Two Responses)
-
- 2) That we might see an adaption of XTP (Express Transfer Protocol)
- for cell relay networks. A version of XTP is being used for Startlight
- video networks.
- (One Response, InterOp Intelligence)
-
- 3) Lot of folks wanted more info about wave potocols, but no firm
- desire to formalize a wave standard. Groups interested should indicate
- a desire to move forward, possible via more pubic chat group.
- (About ten responses including earlier efforts)
-
- 4) Lot of requests for information about the deflection switching
- research done here at Lockheed, mainly from other research groups.
- The research group will send me a paper on a re-sequencing idea
- to make it compatible with ATM.
- (About six responses)
-
- 5) Some great ideas for low cost adaptation architectures, nothing
- in detail.
- (One response)
-