home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #26 / NN_1992_26.iso / spool / bit / listserv / notisl / 4021 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-13  |  710 b   |  20 lines
  1. Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!stanford.edu!bcm!convex!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!STANFORD.BITNET!CN.SCC
  3. Message-ID: <NOTIS-L%92111217022806@VM.TCS.TULANE.EDU>
  4. Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
  5. Date:         Thu, 12 Nov 1992 10:29:22 PST
  6. Sender:       NOTIS discussion group list <NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET>
  7. From:         Rita Lunnon <CN.SCC@STANFORD.BITNET>
  8. Subject:      899 vs. 866 in MARC hldg
  9. Lines: 9
  10.  
  11. For those of you who have converted volume holdings records to MARC
  12. holdings records: did you opt to use 899 fields or 866 fields, and
  13. why?  Any second thoughts?
  14.  
  15. Thanks in advance.
  16.  
  17. R. Lunnon
  18. Catalog Dept., Stanford University
  19. cn.scc@stanford.bitnet
  20.