home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MSU.BITNET!RWWMAINT
- Message-ID: <CWIS-L%92111309073403@WUVMD.WUSTL.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cwis-l
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 09:53:47 EST
- Sender: "Campus-Wide Information Systems" <CWIS-L@WUVMD.BITNET>
- From: Richard W Wiggins <RWWMAINT@MSU.BITNET>
- Subject: Privacy in use of a CWIS
- In-Reply-To: Message of Thu,
- 12 Nov 1992 09:57:10 GMT from <C.K.Work@SOUTHAMPTON.AC.UK>
- Lines: 25
-
- Our management is keenly concerned about privacy of access to
- CWIS data. We have instituted a policy requiring sanitization
- of Gopher logs so that we cannot track specific access to documents.
- We do this by lopping off the most specific part of the caller's
- domain name / IP address. We do feel it is important to keep
- usage logs, so we can measure the accessibility of documents.
-
- It should be easy to make a case for privacy. Libraries have long
- had strict standards on records of who checks out what materials.
- Several years ago in the US a Federal agency asked major university
- research libraries to track which materials were being accessed by
- foreign nationals; they were roundly rebuffed.
-
- In the case of CWIS data, one can easily imagine scenarios where
- analysis of what documents a user tends to read would reveal a
- great deal about the individual. (The same issue needs to be raised
- w/r/t Usenet News access logs, whether delivered via a CWIS or via
- standard news feed methods.)
-
- Probably over time we're going to end up with items in our CWISes
- that are charged for on a per-access basis -- "900 number" documents --
- and in that case specific accounting records will have to be kept.
- Users should understand the record keeping policies up front.
-
- /Rich Wiggins, Gopher Coordinator, Michigan State U
-