home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SOUTHAMPTON.AC.UK!C.K.WORK
- Via: uk.ac.southampton; Wed, 11 Nov 1992 10:17:16 +0000
- X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
- Message-ID: <20711.9211111015@mail.soton.ac.uk>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cwis-l
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 10:15:23 GMT
- Sender: "Campus-Wide Information Systems" <CWIS-L@WUVMD.BITNET>
- From: "C.K.Work" <C.K.Work@SOUTHAMPTON.AC.UK>
- Subject: Re: Justification for CWIS
- Comments: To: CWIS-L@WUVMD.Wustl.Edu
- In-Reply-To: <no.id>; from "CWIS-L@Edu.Wustl.WUVMD" at Nov 10, 92 7:12 pm
- Lines: 38
-
- >
- > I'm currently developing a grant proposal for a CWIS system for
- > our university. The question that comes up and for which I don't
- > have a very articulate answer is: What does a CWIS do that a network
- > doesn't? Basically, I think that a CWIS represents an easier way
- > of accessing information e.g. it's simply one of a number of ways that
- > an organization "packages" information to better serve its users.
- > Has anyone else run across this question and how did you answer it in
- > your particular situation?
- >
-
- A network is just bits of wire & black boxes - its whats on the network
- that counts! While a network may give you access to various local and
- remote information services, does this constitute a CWIS? It depends how
- you interpret CWIS - is it campus wide access to information resources or
- is it access to information about the campus (it could entail both). I lean
- towards the 2nd interpretation. Our justification for developing a CWIS was
- to provide an easy-to-use, single point of reference for up to date
- information about the university. Its ultimate aim is to be able to answer
- any staff or student query about the university and its facilities without
- the need to refer to one of the many printed directories, pamphlets etc. -
- which of course are always being lost and are out of date the moment they
- come back from the printers!
-
- To achieve this clearly implies a need to collate, organise and package
- information (though there are many possible ways of doing so) and is
- therefore active rather than passive (as might be the case in just letting
- some people add things to the network in an ad hoc fashion).
-
- Can you justify the cost of doing this? Maybe, in the long term, given
- units can save costs on hardcopy production (we're starting to acheive
- this). Also, you may be able to offer services which would not be practical
- in any other way. Less tangible will be staff costs saved which might
- otherwise be spent hunting around for those elusive bits of paper!
-
- Colin K. Work
- University of SOuthampton Computing Services
- C.K.Work@Southampton.AC.UK
-