home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!psgrain!ee.und.ac.za!shrike.und.ac.za!casper.cs.uct.ac.za!Gf22.CS.UCT.AC.ZA!dconway
- From: dconway@cs1.uct.ac.za (D CONWAY)
- Subject: Bonniful glips &c.
- Message-ID: <dconway.18.0@cs1.uct.ac.za>
- Summary: *ful as noun?
- Lines: 29
- Sender: news@casper.cs.uct.ac.za (news)
- Organization: Computer Science Department, University of Cape Town
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 15:10:12 GMT
-
- At gradeschool we were taught that one could recognise the class of a word
- (noun, verb etc) by the position it occupied in a sentence and its ending.
- The classic example of this was the sentence
-
- The bonniful glip grixes mugly.
-
- The made up words "bonniful", "glip" etc. supposedly belong in the
- following classes:
- bonniful = adjective {ending in "ful" and before the noun, "glip"}
- glip = noun {following "ful" and before the verb, "grixes"}
- grixes = verb {ends in "es" (or just "s") and followed by an
- alleged adverb}
- mugly = adverb {follows a verb and ends in "ly"}
-
- Such that the ideal choice of words to substitute in the sentence is
-
- The awful boy drives recklessly.
-
- Point of the post is that, in trying to disprove the theory that position/
- ending predicted the word class, I came up with
-
- The powerful find buses silly.
-
- Only criticism is that "powerful" is an adjectival noun, so - could you find
- a *noun* which ends in "ful", or even a whole new sentence which preferably
- doesn't have any word classes in the predicted order?
-
- (E-mail, I think)
- Thanks, Deane (dconway@cs1.uct.ac.za)
-