home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!decwrl!netcomsv!iscnvx!lange
- From: lange@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com (Alex Lange)
- Subject: Re: acronyms and full stops
- Message-ID: <1992Nov5.140857.28596@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com>
- Reply-To: lange@lmsc.lockheed.com
- Organization: Lockheed Missiles & Space, Sunnyvale CA USA
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
- References: <1992Nov4.105132.10245@black.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 14:08:57 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
- microsoc@black.ox.ac.uk (Microsoc) writes:
- :
- : I was always taught that abbreviations which are all in capital letters
- : (and _all_ acronyms, i.e. pronouncable abbreviations) have _no_ periods (fill
- : stops) in htem. [Excuse typos please]
- : Hence it is BBC, not B.B.C., UN not U.N., USA not U.S.A.
-
- This is borne out by _Words into Type_, 3rd Ed., Prentice Hall, 1974, p. 100:
-
- Concerning the usage of periods in abbreviations, the trend is
- is to eliminate them, especially ... in expressions whose
- elements are all capitalized (NATO, TVA, AWOL)... .
-
- : Also, no need for a period if the last letter of the abbreviation is the
- : last letter of the thing abbreviated.
- : Hence Mr not Mr., Dr not Dr., etc.
-
- This is British, not US usage, which usually requires the period;
- from the same source:
-
- The following are nearly always abbreviated: Mr.,..., Dr.,... .
-
- : >My apologies if I made any mistake: I am not a native English speaker
- : >(It's even worse actually: I'm French! :-) ).
- : >
- :
- : And you dare to admit it on a board mostly read by Britons? You're a brave
- : man, M. Tholome....
-
- Seems as though the U.S.A., Australian, and Canadian particpants
- in alt.usage.english have been discounted! I'm sure this was a slip
- not motivated by linguistic imperialism. (Mark Read: This is not a "flame",
- just a poor joke, perhaps.)
-
- Alex Lange
-