NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #26/NN_1992_26.iso/spool/alt/peeves/16914

Text File | 1992-11-10 | 6.0 KB | 112 lines

Newsgroups: alt.peeves
Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!cs.dal.ca!ug.cs.dal.ca!franklin
From: [e-mail] (Steve Franklin)
Subject: Re: More wisdom from Steve Franklin
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (USENET News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: ug2.cs.dal.ca
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
References: <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 05:22:21 GMT
Lines: 99

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jenny Gutbezahl) writes:
>I got this from Stevie.  Although he seems to have unsubscribed from this
>group (see the line about most people liking his article, surely he
>must have missed all the complaints about it posted in this group), I
>thought it was the appropriate venue for response.
   Actually - no, I haven't unsubscribed from this group. I find you
refreshing, and a reassurance that our gene pool is still diverse and
multi-faceted. In other words, I find you stupid, and look forward to the
day you come to me for a job as a maid. We can't have too many intelligent
people running around competing for my jobs, and as long as there are people
like you - I'll still have someone to tip in the restaurant.
   (of course, I'm purely judging you by what you type. It could be that you
intentionally repress any individual ideas that may be lurking within you,
so that you can just _act_ like a below average individual, rahter than _be_
one.

   Now, of course you so adeptly meet my expectations of you with what you
are about to write: YOU POST EMAIL. How quaint my fine feathered friend. Not
only is it tactless, but it's pointless. What did it prove? Oh yes, it provd
that you're a subtle yet annoying jackass perhaps (who has gripes against
frat boys which probably means you're too ugly to be accepted by any of
them, or invited to any of their parties)
NOTE: I hate frat parties, and you should consider yourself lucky that
you're not invited. Thing is, you obviously don't. We can tell that from
your undisguised bitterness and bull.

>--------------------------forwarded message------------------------------------
>
>>Hmm - that was a poor flame I"m afriad. First of all, you're one of ht
>>the only people who didn't like the article - calling it "stupid" or whatever
>>is a poor way to ignore the fact that you could never give it a half -decent
>>follow up.
>
>No where near as effective as saying "poor flame," eh, stevie boy?

   You realy thought I put much effort into replying to you in mail? I
didn't expect it to be read by anyone above yourself. Notice I tried to keep
sentences short, and keep my numbers of syllables down. Also - I even
slipped a few typos in to keep you at home... If I had known you had posted
it, I would have at least tried to spell words correktlie 8)

>>   Oh, and one more thing - I am not a frat boy - go figger huh? I abhor
>>frats. I do not like what the represent, and they are not for a person like
>>me.
>
>They wouldn't let you join in their reindeer games, eh?  It must be really
>defeating knowing that even a bunch of beer-swilling sexist pigs with
>the collective intelligence of a sea cucumber wouldn't accept you as one
>of their own.  Keep trying though, Stevie, maybe you can join Geeks Anonymous
>and start working to overcome these failures in your personality.
   Ahhh yes - implement the tactic I once knew and loved well - call anyone
a geek over the computers, and chances are you will be right - per capita,
most of them are geeks. Unfortunately, we aren't all geeks dear jen. In
fact, I don't even think I could consider myself a geek. Now, I'm sure dear
ol' mike will argue with that, but I can't see how he'd justify his
argument. He just calls me "vanilla boy", but for what reason I know not ;)

>>Oh, and one more thing - if you're so concerned with my treatment of women,
>>realize that I date women that would dance cerebral circles around you -
>>and apparently they enjoy my company. go figger huh?
>
>The visual imagery of the type of porcine freaks that would deign to date
>youdancing in some psychotic frenzy, scalps peeled back to expose their
>pre-Simian brains is a truly delightful one.  I thank you for sharing with
>us the concept of "The Dance of the Cerebral Circles."
  Oh jen, if you only knew. On this computer you feel like the Queen of
Sheba, but on the outside you're that shy girl who no one notices in class.
This is just a guess, but you come across as another loud-mouthed (typed?)
wanna-be socialite who's so far back in the closet, you'll never get out.
You want to be a fun person, but you can't - so, the answer is:
               USENET
Unfortunately you're as predictable as a conversation with a plant, and
equally as interesting. You derive power trips from your posts to these
groups, suckling the attention you receive from socially-malnourished
individuals who fan each and every word you say. How quaint.
   In any case - I wish you luck Jen, and I look forward to more of your
mental drool. Until then, keep in touch old friend.

steve
>>  ah well, have a nice day, and drink canadian beer.
>
>Nah, I prefer my own, thanks for the offer though.
   hah - home brew huh? I've failed miserably with taht once or twice. Gimme
moosehead any day.

>    <pathetic atttempt at humor in the form of a subliminal sig deleted>
   heh - yes, terribly pathetic. Now, for a REAL .sig (really original)

>***************************************************************************
>[e-mail] is Jenny Gutbezahl @ Univ. of Mass, Amherst
>****************************************************************************
>These opinions are all mine.  Flame all you want, I'll make more

*no comment*
--
aasdSteveFranklin-Subliminal Psychology Major.ks;dlasBlueJaysRULEkasdfeahsdbfl
sd;lfaswoq[eBuyMeAQuadra!!!mbnZMXCNdfsba;KdSPAMiuroqiyetIBMSuxiweuryth'ewr;mxn
qpuepriuPartyOneqtuj;,n.,xnc,kjasFlameMeNot!;lkj;lkgkjd;askElvisLivesjhfquweru
[e-mail],sk;t;lrut[[e-mail],Physics!eq3rwkh;oHA