home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:13314 sci.physics:16648
- Path: sparky!uunet!thehulk!1776!bob
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.physics
- Subject: Refining the Crackpot Index
- Message-ID: <ikmqsB4w165w@1776.COM>
- From: bob@1776.COM (Robert Coe)
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 92 08:44:17 EDT
- References: <1992Oct15.184823.18569@galois.mit.edu>
- Distribution: world
- Organization: 1776 Enterprises, Sudbury MA
- Lines: 21
-
- jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes:
- > >Expressing disdain for the elitism of "fancy mathematics" must surely
- > >merit extra credit on the Crackpot Index.
- >
- > I would certainly like to include this one, but as a strong proponent of
- > "fancy mathematics" myself I fear I am hopelessly biased. Many good
- > physicists, including Feynman, Phil Morrison and Steve Weinberg, have at
- > times expressed their disdain for mathematics that is too "fancy". I have
- > always regarded this as childishness comparable to the mathematicians'
- > occaisional cracks at physics.
-
- Yes, but it's worth remembering that the fanciness of the mathematics re-
- quired to describe a phenomenon can constitute a warning that there is an
- underlying simplification waiting to be discovered. Kepler's mathematical
- formulation of planetary motion, for example, was a lot simpler than Tycho
- Brahe's.
-
- ___ _ - Bob
- /__) _ / / ) _ _
- (_/__) (_)_(_) (___(_)_(/_______________________________________ bob@1776.COM
- Robert K. Coe ** 14 Churchill St, Sudbury, Massachusetts 01776 ** 508-443-3265
-