home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!fuug!funic!news.cs.hut.fi!cs.hut.fi!Ari.Huttunen
- From: Ari.Huttunen@hut.fi (Ari Huttunen)
- Subject: Re: DES Encryption/ Encrypting more than once.
- In-Reply-To: ferret@works.uucp's message of 12 Oct 92 21:45:43 GMT
- Message-ID: <ARI.HUTTUNEN.92Oct13203817@cardhu.cs.hut.fi>
- Lines: 25
- Sender: usenet@cs.hut.fi (Uutis Ankka)
- Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
- References: <wa6JsB7w165w@works.uucp>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:38:20 GMT
-
- In article <wa6JsB7w165w@works.uucp> ferret@works.uucp (Dave Ferret) writes:
-
- ! Just a sidenote to 'Hackers' words...
-
- ! There are also encryption algorithms that when used to encrypt the
- ! plaintext over and over and over, will yield the un-encrypted text. (Ie:
- ! Its a circular encryption -- Sorry, I don't know the correct term here)
-
- Any encryption scheme that has a fixed block length *must* do this. Think
- of a series of encryptions:
- x_1 -> x_2 -> x_3 -> ... -> x_k -> ... -> x_n -> ...
- If 'n' is greater than the possible number of messages that can be encoded
- in the fixed length block, there must be some blocks in the chain that
- are the same (pigeonhole principle). Let x_k and x_n be the same blocks.
- Then by encrypting x_k (n-k)-times yields x_k.
-
- (n-k) might be quite large, though. ;-)
-
- ps. I'm not sure, but it would seem that this applies to every
- block x_n.....?
- --
- ...............................................................................
- Ari Huttunen Any similarity to other alien life forms
- is purely coincidental.
- <Alien 3 misquote>
-