home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!life!tk
- From: tk@ai.mit.edu (Tom Knight)
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Subject: Re: Quantum cryptography: a flawed premise?
- Message-ID: <TK.92Oct12131052@entropy.ai.mit.edu>
- Date: 12 Oct 92 17:10:52 GMT
- References: <141@lorien.OCF.LLNL.GOV>
- Sender: news@ai.mit.edu
- Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
- Lines: 14
- In-reply-to: pearson@angmar.llnl.gov's message of 10 Oct 92 05:25:28 GMT
-
- You would think that a single photon could be amplified, for example
- in a laser-like structure to produce additional copies. Measuring one
- of the copies in one polarization, and another in the orthogonal
- polarization, would give the complete answer to the question of the
- state of the original particle, destroying the cryptanalytic basis of
- quantum cryptography. Unfortunately (or fortunately if you are a
- cryptographer), there is intrinsic noise associated with the
- amplification process, in just the amount required to prevent this
- process from succeeding. If you want to look at the details of the
- quantum mechanics, look at e.g. "Quantum noise in linear amplifiers"
- H.A. Haus and J.A. Muller, Phys. Rev. Vol 128 pp 2407-2413 (1962). It
- is perhaps most easily accesible in the excellent collection "Quantum
- Theory and Measurement" edited by Wheeler and Zurek, Princeton U.
- Press, 1983.
-